Big Box Ordinances Number of Term Paper

Total Length: 2104 words ( 7 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 6

Page 1 of 7

A living wage is intended to provide a certain minimum level to sustain life and to push toward the abolition of poverty. It is also based on the vie that money can be saved by the city if the city does not have to provide certain health and other services to the working poor because they can pay for it themselves or because their employers provide it as part of the package. By most measures, it saves money when the employer makes such arrangements because the employer is more cost-conscious than a government entity may be. In truth, it would be preferable if a larger political entity made such an ordinance binding, as is noted by Coverford (2006), who says the Chicago law would be ineffective in the suburbs because retailers could easily move across boundaries to a smaller suburb without such a law it if so chose. If the living wage were a state or national law, it could cover everyone and would reduce the sort of shifting that might take place in a smaller jurisdiction.

Hansen (2007) points out that such laws have been passed in 140 cities and counties across the country, and when they have been challenged, they have usually been upheld by the courts.
He cites some who see the Chicago ordinance as having gone too far because it included health benefits and so ran afoul of state and federal jurisdiction in those matters (Hansen, 2007, p. 14). This would be another good reason for a state and federal law on the subject, though there seems to be little political will to pass such an ordinance at this time, at least in most states. The argument that targeting large retailers is unfair was rejected in a federal decision in California, so that argument may not be as persuasive in the future (Hansen, 2007, p. 15).

The movement for a living wage is gaining traction, though proponents still have a long way to go to make this a reality across most of the country. Opponents still claim that such laws will destroy the economy, and they do so in spite of studies showing that the laws do no such thing and may even bring major benefits. The issue is unsettled but also coming to the fore more and more. The battle is currently being fought one municipality at a time, though the time may come when a larger law is sought and passed to cover an entire state......

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Big Box Ordinances Number Of" (2007, August 19) Retrieved May 23, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/big-box-ordinances-number-36157

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Big Box Ordinances Number Of" 19 August 2007. Web.23 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/big-box-ordinances-number-36157>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Big Box Ordinances Number Of", 19 August 2007, Accessed.23 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/big-box-ordinances-number-36157