Contrast of Occupational and Organizational Deviance Research Paper

Total Length: 854 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 2

Page 1 of 3

police corruption. Furthermore, it will address the areas of organizational and occupational deviance.

Occupational and Organizational Deviance

The definition for occupational or workplace deviance given by Bennett and Robinson is: voluntary employee behavior that goes against key company norms, and hence, threatens its well-being as well as that of fellow employees. The workplace represents a forum in which several different behaviors can be seen, with each of them having different consequences to organizational members and the overall organization. Such behaviors normally fall within organizational norms' constructs (Matthew, et.al, 2014). Company norms are defined as a collection of expected principles, behaviors, languages, and postulations, which enable its operations to progress at the proper pace. Any action is considered an occupational deviance if important organizational rules are violated by it. Some examples of occupational deviance include: absenteeism, alcohol/drug abuse, abusing sick leaves, sabotage, filing false accident claims, rule-breaking, stealing, not working to one's capacity, working slowly, taking unnecessarily long breaks, hiding required resources, and harassing fellow employees. On the other hand, organizational deviance refers to the company itself being the source of deviance; in other words, organizational deviance represents all-out corruption.

Police Corruption Cases

A police corruption incident transpired in San Francisco, California, initiated by surveillance footage that seemed to depict police officials as thieves.

Stuck Writing Your "Contrast of Occupational and Organizational Deviance" Research Paper?

In its very first verdicts, a couple of veteran officers were found guilty, by a federal-level court jury, of stealing cash worth several thousand dollars and property from individuals suspected to be drug dealers, for enriching themselves and defrauding California (Egelko, 2014). After deliberation for 3.5 days, the jury unanimously convicted Edmond Robles, an officer, for 5 charges of felony and Ian Furminger, a sergeant, for four. They were acquitted of 4 charges, which included conspiracy for depriving citizens of honest services, while a charge of theft made against the latter reached an impasse, among jurors (Egelko, 2014). The investigation that followed resulted in the above two personnel and 4 others being indicted. Out of these four, Reynaldo Vargas, identified in the footage, confessed to committing 4 acts on the 21st of October, 2014; he served as the key witness from the prosecution side against Furminger and Robles. Charges against the remaining suspects, all of whom were employees at the Southern Station, are pending. This is a case of workplace deviance.

A federal complaint, which was filed against Tulsa, Oklahoma, by a 63-year-old former prisoner,….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Contrast Of Occupational And Organizational Deviance" (2016, January 31) Retrieved June 13, 2026, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/contrast-occupational-organizational-deviance-2155403

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Contrast Of Occupational And Organizational Deviance" 31 January 2016. Web.13 June. 2026. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/contrast-occupational-organizational-deviance-2155403>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Contrast Of Occupational And Organizational Deviance", 31 January 2016, Accessed.13 June. 2026,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/contrast-occupational-organizational-deviance-2155403