Critical Thinking Case Study Analysis Case Study

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 790 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 0

Page 1 of 3

This means that even though the University deemed it necessary for a student like Helen to disclose her incident of victimization, she still opted to keep her privacy, preferring confidentiality and anonymity in order to protect herself from being involved in a sensitive issue such as sexual harassment. Helen's actions may be construed as her own way of avoiding the stigma that inevitably results out of her being a victim of sexual harassment.

Options

Evidently, Helen had valued her privacy greater than following University rules concerning disclosure. Her action is understandable: in most of the extant organizations' Code of Ethics, the welfare of the patient/client is foremost than the issues of disclosure. Thus, the preferred course of action in Helen's case is to agree with her decision to seek student counseling. The University could try to convince Helen to disclose the details of her victimization, but the University must ensure her that she would be disclosing on the condition that her privacy would not be invaded -- that is, her identity would be concealed and the details of her case remain confidential unless necessary (e.g., discussing and presenting her case for the dismissal of the individual responsible for Helen's victimization).

Stuck Writing Your "Critical Thinking Case Study Analysis" Case Study?

View All Our Example Critical Thinking Case Study Analysis Case Study

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

However, should Helen decide to refuse to reveal her case, the University must respect her decision. Also, her counselor would be duty-bound to Helen, not the University, to help Helen get over the ordeal she had just dealt and will be dealing with.

Conclusions

From Helen's case, it is evident that her welfare must be considered first above anything else. Maintaining her privacy and if possible, keeping her identity anonymous and case confidential (if she requests these) are the most effective ways in which she will be able to deal with her problem.

Recommendations

It is thus recommended that the University must ensure Helen that her privacy would not be invaded, should it pursue to convince her to disclose the details of her victimization. The University can argue that her case would help the institution deal effectively and justly to future incidences of sexual harassment and be able to provide Helen with the justice that she deserves, having been unfairly taken advantage by another individual under the University's authority......

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Critical Thinking Case Study Analysis" (2005, July 25) Retrieved May 20, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/critical-thinking-case-study-analysis-67455

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Critical Thinking Case Study Analysis" 25 July 2005. Web.20 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/critical-thinking-case-study-analysis-67455>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Critical Thinking Case Study Analysis", 25 July 2005, Accessed.20 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/critical-thinking-case-study-analysis-67455
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example