Defendant Entitled to Dispute the Courts Characterization Essay

Total Length: 726 words ( 2 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 2

Page 1 of 2

defendant entitled to dispute the courts characterization of him or her being a danger to society?

A defendant is certainly entitled to dispute the courts characterization of him or her as being dangerous to society. This is so because everyone has the right to a fair trial. This is one of the essentials of the American Constitution.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), in fact, insists that all are presumed innocent until proven guilty and that extensive care should be taken to ensure that the court has arrived at the correct decision. In that case, it only makes sense that the defendant -- who is, after all the focus of the case - should dispute the court's characterization of her if she thinks it necessary to do so.

Articles 6, 7, 8 and 11 all tell her to do so, but the key injunction lies in Article 10 which states that:

"Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him." (United Nations.

Stuck Writing Your "Defendant Entitled to Dispute the Courts Characterization" Essay?

"Universal declaration of Human Rights." )

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) is another canon that insists on the right of a convicted person to have the court reviews his or her conviction. The defendant can certainly plead his case:

All persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals. In the determination of any criminal charge against him, or of his rights and obligations in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law. (Doebbler, 2006).

Many other conventions reiterate this claim. In all cases, therefore, the defendant is certainly entitled to dispute the courts characterization of him or her as being dangerous to society.

2. Active narcotics addicts may be untrustworthy and high-risk cases if released before trail on bond. Is this really fair to defendants? Why or why not, explain your answer.

Active narcotics should not be released before trial on bond. This is so not only due to the fact that they….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Defendant Entitled To Dispute The Courts Characterization" (2012, October 16) Retrieved July 4, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/defendant-entitled-dispute-courts-characterization-82623

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Defendant Entitled To Dispute The Courts Characterization" 16 October 2012. Web.4 July. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/defendant-entitled-dispute-courts-characterization-82623>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Defendant Entitled To Dispute The Courts Characterization", 16 October 2012, Accessed.4 July. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/defendant-entitled-dispute-courts-characterization-82623