Dhmo.Org: Website Evaluation Essay

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 849 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 2

Page 1 of 3

DHMO.org

Thousands of Websites have sprung up in the past. With numerous Web pages littering the Web, it could be difficult for an average user to figure out just which Website contains trusted and valid content. In that regard, therefore, the relevance of developing Website content evaluation skills cannot be overstated. In seeking to highlight some of the strategies of Website content evaluation, this text concerns itself with a real life Website - http://www.dhmo.org/

From the onset, it is important to note that when it comes to Website content evaluation, there is need for an individual to conduct a critical analysis of information sources. Essentially, there are ten things an individual ought to look out for when evaluating an information source. These include: the author, the publication date of the source, the edition, the publisher, the journal title, the target audience, objective reasoning, coverage, style of writing, and opinions voiced in evaluative reviews (Cornell University Library, 2014).

With regard to the author, the key consideration should be whether or not the author has the necessary expertise in the topic under consideration. Although it identifies the copyright owner of the Webpage content, DHMO.org does not give the academic credentials of the author. It is, therefore, difficult to establish the author's expertise on the subject at hand. The publication date is also critical.

Stuck Writing Your "Dhmo.Org: Website Evaluation" Essay?

View All Our Example Dhmo.Org: Website Evaluation Essay

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

As a general rule, one should limit themselves to materials published within the last ten years. It appears that DHMO.org is updated on a regular basis. It should also be noted that revised material or one that has had several editions released could also be deemed more reliable. Many editions, essentially, "may indicate that the work has become a standard source in the area and is reliable" (Cornell University Library, 2014). One also ought to evaluate a source by matching their needs with the intended audience of the publication. Needless to say, an elementary source would be inappropriate for advanced academic papers. The intended audience of DHMO.org appears to be members of the public seeking answers to the controversy that surrounds dihydrogen monoxide. Next, there is also need for objective reasoning, with key considerations in this case being whether or not the information presented is mere propaganda or fact, whether the information is well-researched, whether the author's perspective is impartial, etc. (Cornell University Library, 2014). At first instance, it would be difficult to categorize information presented in DHMO.org as being mere propaganda or fact. This is particularly the case given that no information about the author's credentials is provided. Upon closer….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Dhmo Org Website Evaluation" (2014, September 22) Retrieved May 21, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/dhmoorg-website-evaluation-191990

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Dhmo Org Website Evaluation" 22 September 2014. Web.21 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/dhmoorg-website-evaluation-191990>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Dhmo Org Website Evaluation", 22 September 2014, Accessed.21 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/dhmoorg-website-evaluation-191990
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example