Diversity in Post-Civil War U.S. Term Paper

Total Length: 975 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 2

Page 1 of 3

History is full of lessons, inspirational figures, and events that remain resonant in the nation today. For these things to have the most impact, and most value, demands that they be put into some sort of context.

Each subgroup of American takes more from the history of the land when they are able to apply the history presented to them to their own personal culture and experiences. Many elements of history retain their value across racial, gender and other cultural lines but some elements have special meaning to their respective groups. Even if a broad history has synthesized these elements, for maximum value to an individual group, that group's history should also be broken out, so that members of that group can see how their history contributes to the nation's history as a whole.

Another reason we need to incorporate the individual histories of specific identity groups is so that members of other groups can understand the position of each identity group's history in relation to the broader history of the nation. Understand the unique perspectives of the various groups that comprise our collective group enables us to more effectively cut through bias, because it gives us a sense of the other group's perspective. Knowing these differing perspectives also allows for better cross-transfer of ideas, which in turn fosters better understanding. Moreover, it allows us to learn stronger lessons from history, and to put today's events in a more clear perspective.


The U.S. after the Civil War is a highly diverse society, with some radically different perspectives. Because of this, it is the perfect example of the need for diversity in our historiography. The history of the U.S. cannot be adequately recorded, studied, or explained without first building the individual histories of the people, regions and time periods that comprise the nation. Each of these individual histories can then be incorporated into the history at large. To do otherwise would be to exclude groups and their contributions to the history, and to society. It would also make it difficult for members of those groups to place themselves within a viable historical context, resulting in alienation from the group. It would also lend a needless degree of bias to the history, which would reduce the effectiveness of the history. We should always be cognizant of the diversity of our historiography in order to ensure complete and accurate diversity of our recorded history.

Works Used:

Novick, Peter (1988). That Noble Dream: The Objectivity Question and the American Historical Profession. Cambridge University Press. pp 571-586 Retrieved May 8, 2008 at http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&id=b42WRrk0-rEC&dq=historiography&printsec=frontcover&source=web&ots=waBY57wWAQ&sig=3cWyrBdpCMCOZxe6QxQ0Zfn7uMk#PPA576,M1

American Historiography. Answers.com. Retrieved May 8, 2008 at http://www.answers.com/topic/historiography-american.....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Diversity In Post-Civil War U S " (2008, May 09) Retrieved June 5, 2026, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/diversity-post-civil-war-us-29986

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Diversity In Post-Civil War U S " 09 May 2008. Web.5 June. 2026. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/diversity-post-civil-war-us-29986>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Diversity In Post-Civil War U S ", 09 May 2008, Accessed.5 June. 2026,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/diversity-post-civil-war-us-29986