Free Speech Term Paper

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 1691 words ( 6 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1+

Page 1 of 6

Freedom of Speech, or the right to express oneself, verbally and in writing, as one chooses, and how, when, to whom, and in what manner one chooses, is a guarantee of all American citizens, protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Specifically, the First Amendment to the Constitution states: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances

." It is my opinion that freedom of speech has always been, and remains, a necessary component of any open society. However, the political and social value of freedom of speech tends to become forgotten when a people feel that they are unsafe, or begin to feel threatened by their own peers (current American fear of terrorism "from within" is one such example; another was the reticence of many Americans, in the run-up to the Iraq War, to speak out against it for fear of seeming "unpatriotic." At times such as these, freedom of speech can easily give way to both censorship and self-censorship. It is my opinion, however, that freedom of speech must be protected by law, and insisted upon by individual citizens and groups, to the full extent of the U.S. Constitution, within popular, unpopular, and ambiguous national circumstances alike.

From time to time, freedom of speech also is threatened, or comes under attack, within academic, corporate, or other public circumstances or settings. For example, University of Colorado professor Ward Churchill recently came under attack for comments he made in a public speech, in which he compared victims of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, those who happened to be working inside New York's World Trade Center that day and perished, to cogs in Hitler's war machine. Understandably, Churchill's remarks resulted in enormous public anger, outrage, resentment, animosity, and even threats on his own life. Demands were made from everywhere for Churchill to now have his university tenure revoked, be fired, or worse. As poor in judgment; harsh; thoughtless and cruel as Churchill's remarks may have been, however, under the First Amendment, he still had the right to make them, and in my opinion, the freedom of speech of even someone like him should be protected. If not, it is just to easy for a society of ours to begin granting freedom of speech to those who have things to say we agree with and denying it to others. That is no freedom of speech at all.

The strength of the First Amendment, in fact, is that it protects everyone's free speech, not just desirable free speech According to Derechos Human Rights:

Freedom of expression is one of the most fundamental rights that individuals enjoy. It is fundamental to the existence of democracy and the respect of human dignity. It is also one of the most dangerous rights, because freedom of expression means the freedom to express one's discontent with the status quo and the desire to change it. As such, it is one of the most threatened rights, with governments - and even human rights groups - all over the world constantly trying to curtail it

The guarantee of free speech is both a sign of an open society and a protection that distinguishes the United States from other, less open societies that offer their citizens no such protections. Freedoms guaranteed United States citizens based on the First Amendment include freedoms of "speech; press; religion, assembly and petition" ("About the First Amendment"). Further, "Without the First Amendment, religious minorities could be persecuted, the government might well establish a national religion, protesters could be silenced, the press could not criticize government, and citizens could not mobilize for social change" ("About the First Amendment"). Freedom of speech also protects movies, videos, song lyrics, advertisements, and other communications that may not be to everyone's taste.

Stuck Writing Your "Free Speech" Term Paper?

View All Our Example Free Speech Term Paper

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

The alternative to freedom of speech is government censorship. As Wikipedia points out, however: "The philosopher Alexis de Tocqueville observed that people may be hesitant to speak freely not because of fear of government retribution but because of social pressures.

" That is, when an individual states an opinion that is not mainstream, or is considered unpopular, he or she might be subjected to peer pressure to change or retract the opinion; community rejection; disdain or ostracism, or even threatening or violent reactions from others. As Tocqueville correctly predicted, the fear of such reaction to the exercise of free speech, on the part of many individuals, even with the free speech protections granted by the U.S. Constitution, often functions as a sort of self censorship.

This is especially true, in my own opinion, when, for one reason or another, national emotions run high, in a negative sense, due to fear, anxiety, anger, etc. A great danger at such times, and one I have seen first hand in recent years, is that of self-censorship, rather than speaking the truth as one sees it, even if others (perhaps even a majority) disagree. When the United States first declared war on Iraq, I read and heard about (and personally observed) a great many individuals in academic, professional, or other settings disagreeing vigorously, in private and among like-minded friends, with the war for all sorts of good and logical reasons (which, as it turns out in hindsight, have now almost all been confirmed), but afraid to speak up, sign petitions, send e-mails, or be seen at rallies because they thought their words and actions might be seen as "unpatriotic." Their fear at the time (within a nation that supposedly guarantees and protects free speech for all) of speaking up against the Iraq War was that it could even have serious personal or professional repercussions.

However, I wondered then, and now, if the war might not actually have happened after all, if the millions of citizens who truly opposed it, but feared saying so, would have all exercised their freedom of speech. It is at times like this, moreover, that the bedrock American idea of freedom of speech comes under greatest attack, yet must be protected all the more.

When citizens reach a point where they cannot tolerate one another's diverse opinions, and begin, then, to engage in censorship, self-censorship, or both, it is a sign that the openness that has always been a hallmark of American society is beginning to break down.

Some might still argue that free speech the Founding Fathers described has simply become too dangerous, especially in the times we live in now: too likely to incite violence by one citizen against another; one group against another, or bring about other unpleasant consequences. As the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) points out:

historically, at times of national stress -- real or imagined -- First Amendment rights come under enormous pressure. During the Red Scare of the early

1920s, thousands were deported for their political views. During the McCarthy period, the infamous blacklist ruined lives and careers. Today, the creators, producers and distributors of popular culture are often blamed for the nation's deep social problems. Calls for censorship threaten to erode free speech.

The First Amendment exists precisely to protect the most offensive and controversial speech from government suppression. The best way to counter obnoxious speech is with more speech. Persuasion, not coercion, is the solution

Free speech has been imperiled in the past in America, even early on. One famous example is the Sedition Act of 1789. Jedidiah Peck was arrested during this time for daring to circulate a petition critical of the sedition act: David Brown was arrested for publicly campaigning against the Stamp Act, the Sedition Act, Alien Bills, and the Land Tax

. All four acts….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


Related Essays

Freedom of Speech and How It is Necessary

after survey has shown that too many students at all levels including in college dont understand free speech and dont know that it is guaranteed by the First Amendment, (Strauss, 2017, p. 1). The reason why I am writing about freedom of speech in relation to the reaction to Kaepernick is that the First Amendment encompasses the fundamental rights and freedoms fundamental to democracy. The goal of the paper is to explain the facts of the case through the lens of both ethics and constitutional law. Ultimately, I want to demonstrate to the audience why a democracy cannot function without freedom of speech. I also want… Continue Reading...

The First Amendment and Texas Law

offensive. However, the outrage of the society is not a justification to suppress the free speech. The majority argued that the Texas Law discriminated upon the viewpoint in that it allowed actions that were respectful of venerated objects that include the burning of a worn-out flag (Holzer, 649). In Virginia vs. Black, the court ruled that such a statute was unconstitutional although the majority argued that a state may ban cross burning if it is carried out with the intention to intimidate. Using the act as a prima facie was found to be unconstitutional by the court, which means that the state of Virginia… Continue Reading...

At-Will Employment and the Law

he can be fired. As Cavico et al. (2013) note, social media is an outlet of free speech, and as Riddle (2016) observes, the National Labor Relations Board has viewed social media criticism of a person's workplace as fair and not a condition that justifies firing an employee -- in other words, it cannot be used to terminate an at-will employment. However, in John's case, he did not criticize the company but rather the company's client. This opens the incident to an all new interpretation -- and it could therefore be seen as grounds for releasing John. Thus, John could be legally fired. However, to limit… Continue Reading...

The Causes of Fake News and How to Prevent It

social media is more likely to be perceived of as true than one that can be fact-checked (Papanastasiou, 2017). C. Claim: Free speech enables the creation and dissemination of fake news, and free speech can also be the most effective weapon against fake news. 1. Evidence: Librarians are at the forefront of media literacy, and can help stop fake news (Becker, 2016). 2. Evidence: Aggressive and systematic tagging of fake news is essential because anything that is not tagged as “fake” will be perceived of as real (Pennycook & Rand, 2017). D. Claim: Technological tools can help prevent fake news from proliferating, even though it is technological tools that cause fake… Continue Reading...

Fake News Outline

proliferation of fake news stories, curbing the influence of fake news has become a daunting, if not totally impossible, task. IV. Body Paragraph A. Claim: Free speech enables the creation and dissemination of fake news, and free speech can also be the most effective weapon against fake news. 1. Evidence: Librarians are at the forefront of media literacy, and can help stop fake news (Becker, 2016). 2. Evidence: Aggressive and systematic tagging of fake news is essential because anything that is not tagged as “fake” will be perceived of as real (Pennycook & Rand, 2017). V. Body Paragraph A. Counterargument: It is too difficult to debunk fake news because the algorithms used in social media… Continue Reading...

Court Process, Judicial Process, and Constitutional Issues

executive branch and limited people's rights. Some examples of these limitations include restrictions on privacy, limitation of free speech and association rights, and limitation of religious freedom. While these actions were necessary to help prevent another attack, they are inappropriate since they compromise civil rights and checks and balances established in America's democracy. The federal government would have taken less drastic measures through reordering priorities of law enforcement instead of generating fundamental changes in law. Week 5: Discussion In the American judicial system, the Supreme Court reviews very few cases most of whom are appeals from lower courts. It should not be mandatory for the Supreme Court… Continue Reading...

John Stuart Mills On Liberty

restrict free speech, sexual behavior, or other personal, private choices. However, since Mill wrote, even a number of sympathetic philosophers have found the harm principle to be problematic because of its failure to consider social consequences of apparently self-injurious activities. [1: David Brink, "Mill's Moral and Political Philosophy," The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2016, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/mill-moral-political/>.] [2: Ibid.] Further Elucidation of the Harm Principle First and foremost, to critique the harm principle, it is essential to understand what constitutes harm in Mill's estimation. A harm is something far more serious than what… Continue Reading...

sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Free Speech" (2005, May 03) Retrieved May 20, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/free-speech-66401

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Free Speech" 03 May 2005. Web.20 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/free-speech-66401>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Free Speech", 03 May 2005, Accessed.20 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/free-speech-66401
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example