Free Speech on the Internet Research Paper

Total Length: 1433 words ( 5 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 10

Page 1 of 5

Anthony Elonis - 18 U.S.C. §875(c)

Case Overview

In this case, Anthony D. Elonis was convicted for publishing a series of Facebook posts describing committing acts of violence towards various people in violation of § 875(c) (Wald and Milazzo). In May 2010, Anthony Elonis's wife moved out of their home with their two young children which consequently angered Elonis who then began posting on his Facebook page descriptions of how he wanted to kill his wife -- one such post, referring to his wife, stated: "If I only knew then what I know now, I would have smothered your ass with a pillow, dumped your body in the back seat, dropped you off in Toad Creek, and made it look like a rape and murder" (Larkin and Richardson). In October 2010, after having lost his job arguably due to another Facebook posting, Elonis's musings became darker and more vitriolic (Lempert).

Because of these and other statements, Elonis's wife was able to obtain a Protection from Abuse order against Elonis on November 4, 2010. The FBI began to monitor Elonis's Facebook posts after Dorney Park also claimed that Elonis had posted threats against their employees on the site. During the investigation, FBI Agents questioned Elonis at his home about his Facebook posts and after they left, Elonis posted the following on his Facebook page (Larkin and Richardson):

"So the next time you knock, you best be serving a warrant

And bring yo' SWAT and an explosives expert while you're at it

Cause little did y'all know, I was strapped wit' a bomb

Why do you think it took me so long to get dressed with no shoes on?

I was jus' waitin' for y'all to handcuff me and pat me down

Touch the detonator in my pocket and we're all goin -- BOOM!'"

The FBI used these statements to officially charge Elonis with the provisions of interstate commerce and the communication of a threat to injure. It is a federal crime to "transmit [] in interstate or foreign commerce any communication containing any threat to injure the person of another," 18 U.S.C. § 875(c) and numerous states have adopted analogous crimes (Wald and Milazzo).


Case Issues

The internet has revolutionized the way that people communicate and share their thoughts and opinions with others. It provides new mediums in which people can exercise their rights to free speech. However, in some cases free speech has its limits. While the internet can be a remarkable and valuable tool for purposes of exchanging artistic, political, religious and educational ideas that are protected by the First Amendment, it can also be a dangerous tool in the hands of those who seek to cause fear in others through threats and intimidation (Memeger). Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, YouTube, and other social media sites can also be used as medium to threaten, harass, and stalk other citizens.

Determining what constitutes a threat can be a complex and subjective exercise however. Many analysts liken the Facebook posts to other violent expressions such as rap music. Such music notoriously use threatening and violent language but are commonly allowed because they are considered an "art form" and is protected under the first amendment. In fact, Elonis stated that he was inspired by rap music and some of his posts mirrored rap-like lyrics.

"There's one way to love you but a thousand ways to kill you. I'm not going to rest until your body is a mess, soaked in blood and dying from all the little cuts. Hurry up and die, bitch, so I can bust this nut all over your corpse from atop your shallow grave." (Lithwick)

Elonis and his defense team tried to argue that his postings were not a "true threat" and his comments were protected under the First Amendment. Elonis changed his Facebook name and did not tag his wife in the messages and thus she could not readily see them. Moreover, the posts that formed the basis of the indictment followed earlier seemingly angry posts which Elonis had characterized as rap lyrics using "crude, spontaneous and emotional language expressing frustration" and explained that he wrote that his postings were "for me. My writing is therapeutic"; this was consistent with his having said that the writings, "help[ed] me deal with the pain." He had also….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Free Speech On The Internet" (2015, April 10) Retrieved April 29, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/free-speech-internet-2150604

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Free Speech On The Internet" 10 April 2015. Web.29 April. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/free-speech-internet-2150604>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Free Speech On The Internet", 10 April 2015, Accessed.29 April. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/free-speech-internet-2150604