Hate Crimes Differ From Ordinary Term Paper

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 1135 words ( 4 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 8

Page 1 of 4

Levin (1992, cited in Nolan & Akiyama, 1999) notes that police officers tend to identify crimes based on the severity of injury or the magnitude of property damage and not on the basis of motive.

There are many thinkers and writers that question the legitimacy of hate or bias crime laws on the basis that they violate a fundamental democratic principle by punishing individuals for their prejudiced thoughts and beliefs (Altman, 2001). The assumption is that the defendant had a bias motive for committing the offense and the motive consists solely of the defendant's thought. (Gellman, 1992). Therefore, it has been argued that bias crime laws are illegitimate because they punish motive. In addition, the fact that complicates things further is that the motive is inextricably tied to a certain set on political values and attitudes. Other writers have recognized that hate crime is a social construct, focusing on prejudice as a criminal act. It attempts to extend the civil rights paradigm into the field of criminal law. (Jacobs & Potter, 1998).

However, there are several justifications put forth for such laws. These justifications also serve in the context of this paper as further arguments that help differentiate hate crimes from ordinary crimes. James Weinstein (cited in Altman, 2001) gave five possible justifications for such laws: prejudice is morally reprehensible than other motives and so deserves greater punishment (retributive justice); society's morality holds prejudice to be morally more reprehensible and so requires more punishment; bias crime do extra harm to their victims because the offense is understood as an attack on their identity; bias crimes do extra harm to the victim's community because the attack is understood by the community as an attack against it and a threat to its members; bias crimes do extra harm to society in general because they increase tensions and conflict among social groups.

Stuck Writing Your "Hate Crimes Differ From Ordinary" Term Paper?

View All Our Example Hate Crimes Differ From Ordinary Term Paper

Have A Custom Example Essay Written



The incidences of hate crime are important because are the first step in recognizing the importance and impact of such crimes. After the hate crime occurs, before the crime is counted as part of the national data, the victim must report the crime to the police. The police records the crime by completing an incident report. Therefore, as stated above, it is vital that the police identify correctly the nature of the crime. Moreover, a proper recording of hate crime incidents provides information on the type of victim (for instance in 2004, most of the reported hate crimes were motivated by race) and the type of underlying crime that has been reported (in 2004 the most common manifestation of hate crime was vandalism) (according to McDevitt et al.)......

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Hate Crimes Differ From Ordinary" (2007, October 05) Retrieved June 15, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/hate-crimes-differ-ordinary-35373

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Hate Crimes Differ From Ordinary" 05 October 2007. Web.15 June. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/hate-crimes-differ-ordinary-35373>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Hate Crimes Differ From Ordinary", 05 October 2007, Accessed.15 June. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/hate-crimes-differ-ordinary-35373
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example