Heidegger Ontology Vs. St. Anselm Term Paper

Total Length: 1504 words ( 5 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 3

Page 1 of 5

It was empirical and inductive. Understanding being alone was a problem to Heidegger. It would be a greater problem to infer a God from that understanding.

On the other hand, St. Anselm poses a generalized stand by drawing on a negative hypothesis. God is that than which nothing could be imagined as greater. Nothing can be greater than that imaginable entity. He furthermore argues that an existent God is greater than a non-existent God. From these two premises, he concludes that the greatest imaginable entity is God and that a God that exists is greater than a God that does not exist.

Stuck Writing Your "Heidegger Ontology Vs. St. Anselm" Term Paper?

St. Anselm uses absurd logic, phrased in the negative. Heidegger uses everyday and tangible experience and presents it in the affirmative. St. Anselm derives everything else from that generalization of God's existence from logic. Heidegger finds it painstaking and nearly impossible to even completely understand the concept of being......

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Heidegger Ontology Vs St Anselm" (2007, December 30) Retrieved June 29, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/heidegger-ontology-st-anselm-33062

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Heidegger Ontology Vs St Anselm" 30 December 2007. Web.29 June. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/heidegger-ontology-st-anselm-33062>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Heidegger Ontology Vs St Anselm", 30 December 2007, Accessed.29 June. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/heidegger-ontology-st-anselm-33062