Historiographical Debate Into the Effects of Santa Anna's Reign in Mexico Term Paper

Total Length: 4136 words ( 14 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 13

Page 1 of 14

Santa Anna Dictatorship

In his self-described revisionist biography Santa Anna of Mexico (2007), Will Fowler has courageously taken up the defense of the Mexico caudillo, fully aware that he is all but universally reviled in the historiography of the United States and Mexico. From the beginning, he made his intention clear to vindicate the reputation of a dictator whose "vilification has been so thorough and effective that the process of deconstructing the numerous lies that have been told and retold" is almost impossible.[footnoteRef:1] Timothy J. Henderson asserted that he had a great talent for exploiting and manipulating political divisions but none for governing a country. In U.S. history and popular culture, he has always been portrayed as a corrupt megalomaniac, the 'Napoleon of the West', responsible for the massacres at the Alamo and Goliad. As John Chasteen and James Wood put it, even his autobiography was an "extraordinary work of self-dramatization" by a dictator who put on a show of being a "vulnerable, introspective protagonist" but was in reality a power-hungry tyrant with "unmitigated vanity" and "obvious self-absorption."[footnoteRef:2] Fowler is not completely successful in redeeming his subject from all the negative historiography surrounding him, especially given Santa Anna's well-deserved reputation for corruption, nepotism and brutality, but he may well be correct that no one else could have done any better in Mexico under the circumstances.

Stuck Writing Your "Historiographical Debate Into the Effects of Santa Anna's Reign in Mexico" Term Paper?

Fowler uses primary sources to disprove some of the most serious charges that Mexican historians have made against Santa Anna, such as that he was bribed to agree to the independence of Texas in 1836, and that even though he was also bribed by President James K. Polk when he was in exile in Havana in 1846, he nevertheless fought the Mexican War to win as soon as he returned, rather than as a gringo puppet and stooge.[footnoteRef:3] Given the very unfavorable political and economic situation in Mexico in the 1840s, Santa Anna also everything humanly possible to recover Texas and defend the country from a North American invasion. Fowler contends that he was not personally responsible for all the disasters that befell Mexico in this period, but rather the whole system was a failure. In trying to maintain order and hold the country together against all the centrifugal forces from within and within, he had no other option except to take authoritarian measures that went against his earlier liberal beliefs, but in this he was no different from other Latin American dictators then and later, including Simon Bolivar.[footnoteRef:4] [1: Will Fowler, Santa Anna of Mexico (University of Nebraska Press, 2007), p. x.] [2: "Protagonist on a National Stage" in John Charles Chasteen and James A. Wood (eds), Problems in Modern Latin American History:.....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Historiographical Debate Into The Effects Of Santa Anna's Reign In Mexico" (2011, December 03) Retrieved May 18, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/historiographical-debate-effects-santa-anna-115934

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Historiographical Debate Into The Effects Of Santa Anna's Reign In Mexico" 03 December 2011. Web.18 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/historiographical-debate-effects-santa-anna-115934>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Historiographical Debate Into The Effects Of Santa Anna's Reign In Mexico", 03 December 2011, Accessed.18 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/historiographical-debate-effects-santa-anna-115934