Interviewee Was Welcomed to the Research Proposal

Total Length: 723 words ( 2 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1

Page 1 of 2



Interviewer rushes and asks illegal questions -- disability, retirement plans.

Interview neatly deflects these questions without providing a real answer; normally considered unnecessarily obfuscating, these are perfect answers given the circumstance (Gamble & Gamble, 2006).

Interviewer repeatedly brings up financial benefits of the job that interviewee brushes aside. Interviewee also attempts to remember company motto and appears not to care.

Interviewee is definitely signaling his disinterest I the interview. Interviewer is showing a lack of necessary specific preparation (Gamble & Gamble, 2006).

Evaluation: The interviewee is professional, but to used to being in charge and not able to fully relinquish control of conducting the interview. The interviewer failed to provide the definite structure or an image of working or caring necessary (Gamble & Gamble, 2006).

Interview #3

Greetings and introductions extended to the interviewer; he responds in kind.

Polite and professional interaction from the outset of the interview.

Education and current job questions are met with brief yet informative responses.

The clarity and directness of the responses demonstrate the interviewee's listening and information sharing abilities.

Stuck Writing Your "Interviewee Was Welcomed to The" Research Proposal?

Some issues with impression management with repeated

"you knows" and "ums" (Gamble & Gamble, 2006).

Long-range goals and project questions met with pertinent and controlled answers.

Again, the interviewee is professional and prepared, responding well to the series of primary and secondary questions even at a rapid-fire pace (Gamble & Gamble, 2006).

Strengths/weaknesses open question met decisive, honest, and informative answer.

Interviewee demonstrates honest self-assessment while also providing solution to his weakness, showing the interviewer he is a problem solver (Gamble & Gamble, 2006).

Multiple questions regarding self-stated weakness met with somewhat confused response.

Interviewer asked several secondary questions without waiting for answer to primary;

interviewee appears somewhat flustered and responds with a question, failing to provide an answer (Gamble & Gamble, 2006).

Interviewee asks several questions pertaining to the job.

This shows his engagement in the interview as an information seeker, and signals his appropriateness and eagerness to be hired (Gamble & Gamble, 2006).

Evaluation: Both interviewer and interviewee were professional, prepared and engaged; both worked hard (as they should) to conduct.....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Interviewee Was Welcomed To The" (2009, April 02) Retrieved June 27, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/interviewee-welcomed-23376

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Interviewee Was Welcomed To The" 02 April 2009. Web.27 June. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/interviewee-welcomed-23376>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Interviewee Was Welcomed To The", 02 April 2009, Accessed.27 June. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/interviewee-welcomed-23376