Joint Operations Research Paper

Total Length: 1287 words ( 4 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 4

Page 1 of 4

Going forward, threats to U.S. national interests are likely to increase, even as the list of increasingly bold adversaries continues to grow by the day. Geopolitical shifts are also likely to threaten globe peace and order. Threats to the national interests of the U.S. could also be seen as threats to the country’s allies. Former secretary Carter once pointed out that thanks to the United States’ core interests, Israel is assured of “continued qualitative military edge, and why we’re working with our Gulf partners to make them more capable of defending themselves against external aggression” (Cordersman, 2015). On the basis of these facts, the U.S., as the only superpower, ought to foster closer working relations between its Army and those of other countries so as to better address emerging global threats and other challenges.



Building partner capacity is not a new issue. However, as Marquis et al. (2010) points out, it is not until recently that this concept “migrated to positions near the top of the U.S. national security agenda.” In essence, there are three kinds of potential partners in capacity building efforts that have been identified by Marquis et al. 2010. These are coalition partners, regional leaders, and indigenous partners. The authors define a coalition partner as “a willing provider of significant stability operations-related capability in support of coalition operations outside the nation’s own boarders” (Marquis et al. 2010). In essence, such a partner, as the authors further point, out ought to be internally stable, have a strategic ‘chemistry’ or rapport with the U.S., and have the recognition of the international community as a legitimate government. A regional leader, on the other hand, is viewed as “an actual or potential provider of capability and leadership for regionally based stability operations that are compatible with U.S. interests” (Marquis et al. 2010).
Lastly, we have indigenous partners which as Marquis et al. (2010) observe are states that are rather fragile but cooperative and friendly to the U.S. and whose ‘demise’ could threaten the interests of the United States.



It is important to note that capacity and capability building with collaborator armies is fraught with a number of challenges. In typical collaboration efforts, each player has an interest it attempts to secure. Collaboration becomes sustainable with the alignment of these interests. Collaboration efforts also come with a significant degree of inherent risks. These include the risk of collaborating with free riders, and reliability concerns when working with some formations. Assessments should, thereby, be made by the DoD to ensure that partnering Armies not only have the resources, but are also truly invested and involved. An assessment of the political suitability of partners is also a key consideration. According to Reveron (2016), the U.S. deems democratic governments as being acceptable in matters of partnership capacity building due to their democratic ideals; i.e. promotion of basic freedoms and sustenance of credible electoral and justice systems. Partnering with such governments in military operations is seen as the right thing to do given the inherent risks of training rogue governments that could turn the skills and capabilities gained against own citizens.



The war on terror could benefit immensely from partnership and collaboration efforts. According to Marquis et al. (2010), the U.S. army ought to ensure that its war on terror is sustainable. This is more so the case given that it is unlikely that we are going to witness another occupation or invasion any time soon. Arguing for building partner capacity in the war against….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


References

Cordersman, A.H. (2015). Iraq and Syria: The Problem of Strategy. Retrieved from https://www.csis.org/analysis/iraq-and-syria-problem-strategy

Marquis, J.P., Moroney, J.D., Beck, J., Eaton, D., Hiromoto, S., Howell, D.R., Lewis, J., Lynch, C., Neumann, M.J., Thurstan, C.Q. (2010). Developing an Army Strategy for Building Partner Capacity for Stability Operations. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation

Moroney, J.D., Cragin, K., Gons, E., Grill, B., Peters, J.E. & Swanger, R.M. (2009). International Cooperation with Partner Air Forces. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

Reveron, D.S. (2016). Exporting Security: International Engagement, Security Cooperation, and the Changing Face of the U.S. Military (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Related Essays

Joint Function As Related to Operation Anaconda

objective of the operation is vital and without the necessary support, this would be quite difficult. Joint operations also require support from different arms of the Army. Therefore, coordination would be difficult if different strategies and functions were to be used. The operation might have begun on the wrong footing. However, the American forces were able to gain background and pushed the enemy. Without proper coordination and use of the functions, an operation can be ruined. However, it is possible to recover when mistakes are identified and changes are made to factor in the information that is received. Operation Anaconda Case Study Joint Functions Introduction: Operation… Continue Reading...

Operation Anaconda

commanders and personnel on how to conduct joint operations. As shown in this discussion, Operation Anaconda was based on mission command concept of conducting unified military operations against an enemy. Mission command is based on six principles, which are crucial toward the success of an operation. Despite being based on mission command, Operation Anaconda did not adhere or comply to these principles. References Army Doctrine Reference Publication. (2014). Mission Command. Retrieved March 1, 2019, from https://armypubs.us.army.mil/doctrine/index.html Kugler, R. (2007). Operation Anaconda in Afghanistan – A Case Study of Adaptation in Battle. Retrieved March… Continue Reading...

New Equipment Development on Operation Influence of Air Force

share the relevant data in the course of conducting joint operations in shared airspace. Such data could relate to target identification. Next, smaller UAVs are also likely to have greater tactical utility in the future. In essence, micro-UAVs would have the impact of bringing to the individual soldier some key benefits of a bigger air vehicle (Jaffer, 2016). The author further points out that the micro-UAVs would enable the soldier to evade surface obstacles and offer a sneak preview of specific targets - more specifically in confrontations taking place in an urban setting. Further, micro-UAVs would come in handy… Continue Reading...

Mao Zedong and Defense Philosophy

although the military, economic and political environments are likely to be attacked. These future wars will entail joint operations over the land, air, sea, outer space, and cyberspace. The war may even entail use of advanced technology especially in information systems (Cheng, 2011). The analysis of the possible wars has driven PLA to come up with actionable lessons. The evolution of war has made it necessary for PLA to pay particular attention to active defense against long range missiles, stealth aircrafts, and helicopters. The PLA is also attentive on defending against possible electronic warfare, precision strike, surveillance and reconnaissance.… Continue Reading...

sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Joint Operations" (2018, February 15) Retrieved May 6, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/joint-operations-research-paper

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Joint Operations" 15 February 2018. Web.6 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/joint-operations-research-paper>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Joint Operations", 15 February 2018, Accessed.6 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/joint-operations-research-paper