Leadership Decisions Assessing Organizational Capacity Thesis

Total Length: 833 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 3

Page 1 of 3

34). Finally, in the Group II (GII) model, the leader shares the problem with his or her followers, and reaches a true consensus with the group. The leader does not influence the result.

The Group II model requires a great deal of time, so only decisions where time is not of the essence may be relegated to Group II methods (Shackleton 1995, p.36). For this type of time investment, the proposed change is likely to be important, and require a great deal of effort by the implementers of the change. Subordinates must also have a high level of quality of information, and it must be feasible to bring them into the same area for a prolonged period. There must be a great deal of goal congruence between the self-interest of the members of the group and the organization as a whole. In the Collaborative II model, a leader can still solicit information and prospective solutions, but the leader can filter the personal self-interest of the subordinates.

Discuss the methods applied for gaining buy-in to solutions

Both autocratic models require an organization with a great deal of personal trust in the leader, a leader who is able to obtain high-quality information, and where subordinates will be willing to implement the decision and see no personal conflict of interest.

Stuck Writing Your "Leadership Decisions Assessing Organizational Capacity" Thesis?

Buy-in can be generated through the leader's charisma, fear, or force of hierarchy, while in the collaborative models, pleasing the leader and advancing within the organization can act as a 'buy-in' facilitator. The group model commands the highest degree of personal investment, given that the subordinates 'own' the decision, but it also is the most cumbersome of all the models.

Determine the methods for working on a large-scale project.

During a large-scale project, many different types of decisions must be implemented. By using a mixture of autocratic, collaborative, and group decisions, organizational members can feel a sense of personal investment in the project and its outcome, even if not all decisions can be made in a participatory fashion. Simply by having some group and collaborative decisions, and selecting those aspects of proposed change that are enhanced rather than inhibited by a community-based process can improve the outcome of the organization's overall project and the commitment of its workers to the new system or change......

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Leadership Decisions Assessing Organizational Capacity" (2009, November 14) Retrieved May 15, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/leadership-decisions-assessing-organizational-17504

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Leadership Decisions Assessing Organizational Capacity" 14 November 2009. Web.15 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/leadership-decisions-assessing-organizational-17504>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Leadership Decisions Assessing Organizational Capacity", 14 November 2009, Accessed.15 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/leadership-decisions-assessing-organizational-17504