Massey-Burzio, V. "From the Other Research Proposal

Total Length: 1291 words ( 4 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1+

Page 1 of 4



Simple, bullet point, one-sheet explanations are the preferred method of learning research methodology.

Most were unwilling to invest in classes or even seminars regarding proper use of library reference materials.

The library "information desk" was perceived as unhelpful and further, unwilling to be helpful. The "barrier" between the patron and the desk disallows the librarian to visit the computer with the client and do one-on-one tutoring.

Desk staff refer less than 10% of the questions to reference librarians, even when clearing dealing with questions far beyond their purview (Ibid 210-12).

Using the standards suggested by Kuruppu, one is able to glean a broad critique of the Massey-Burzio study:

Issue

Massey-Burzio Use

Comments

Methodology

Focus Group

Good as a primary identifier of questions and direction, inappropriate as a data source; responses are too broad, lack the specificity necessary to tabulate, and only "suggest" data use or further research, does not define (Kuruppu 375).

Sample Size

38 Individuals over time

Admitted small sample size, too small for statistical validation. However, as tool suggested above, the first step in the research, the materials is valuable and suggests some issues with the library, as well as numerous questions for additional research.

Longitudinal Rate

1-Year, new focus group participants over time

Lacks robust veracity -- see above.

Detailed Questions

Limited

Questions limited, does not really reflect the actual need of the initial thesis of the study; may simply be too limited, and study author should have indicated that this was simply an overview prior to actual data collection (Ibid).

Moderator

Knowledgeable about reference materials; not a trained FG moderator

Probably immaterial in this case, but if longer group, a trained moderator who would have probed more and used incoming data to suggest further research; study as Part 1 of a larger, and longer systemized approach, might have proven helpful (Ibid 376).

Assumptions

Generalities of behavior

Conclusions reached indicated that these students are a) representative of the general population of undergraduate and graduate students at Johns Hopkins and b) that the participants are indicative of college age/bound individuals globally.

Stuck Writing Your "Massey-Burzio, V. "From the Other" Research Proposal?

Interpretation of the data suggests a broader study, utilizing differing demographic and pscyhographic profiles, with longitudinal aspects to follow up -- even the act of the FG has changed the way in which the participants utilize the library (375).

Conclusions

Broad Strokes

As a broad stroke discussion point, study is valid and interesting; as an academic discourse with verifiable and universal conclusions, it falls short.

Implications

Further research called for Longitudinal element; demographic/pscyhographic, multiple institution, including non-private, state schools, and possibly broadening to community colleges; the goal is a better understanding of the needs of the user population, so more users must be included.

Overall Positives

Per scholarly literature

Good basic introduction to the research issue; solid forethought and organized methods; if used as a precursor, excellent -- if used as a definitive study, unacceptable.

Overall Negatives

Per scholarly literature

Weak sample and demographic size and makeup; lacks the robust nature to fit even the most basic standards for stand-alone research; broad assumptions that challenge pscyhographic perceptions; statements about "information desk" issues without delving further.

Thus, utilizing a strict academic vetting, the article in question really does little more than whet the appetite for further study. Essentially, it accentuates the negatives of qualitative research that, when used properly, can provide a wealth of information for use in a more robust setting. This might have been easily corrected simply by introducing the bias of the study, and positing for further research, giving more specifics for data collection, sourcing, demographic and pscyhographic modifiers, and a questionnaire based, qualitative element.

REFERENCES CONSULTED

Kuruppu, P., "Evaluation of Reference Services -- a Review." Journal of Academic

Librarianship. 33 no. 3 (2007): 368-81.

Pierce, S. "In Pursuit of the Possible: Evaluating Reference Services." In Evaluating

Reference Services, the Reference Librarian, ed. B.,….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Massey-Burzio V From The Other" (2009, October 06) Retrieved May 19, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/massey-burzio-18872

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Massey-Burzio V From The Other" 06 October 2009. Web.19 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/massey-burzio-18872>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Massey-Burzio V From The Other", 06 October 2009, Accessed.19 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/massey-burzio-18872