Prevailing Legal Theory in the United States Today Research Paper

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 802 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 5

Page 1 of 3

Prevailing Legal Theory in the United States Today

Common legal theories in the United States today

The most commonly-espoused legal theories in the media today are those of 'strict construction' and 'broad construction' (otherwise known as 'judicial activism.') Strict construction, according to its adherents, means strictly adhering to the 'letter of the law' and strictly interpreting the Constitution according to the original intent of the authors of the document. Strict construction uses a "literal and narrow definition of the language without reference to the differences in conditions when the Constitution was written and modern conditions, inventions and societal changes" (Sollum 2009). Strict construction interpreters have been highly critical of decisions such as Brown v. Board of Education, which examined evidence of the psychological impact of segregation upon young, African-American children and Roe v. Wade, which created a test of viability for the fetus while protecting women's absolute right to choose abortion for the first trimester, and only allowed restrictions in the second trimester to protect women's health.

However, many people have called this definition of strict construction somewhat specious, given that so-called conservative U.S. Supreme Court justices have often enacted broad-sweeping legal decisions that significantly enhanced the founders' interpretation of the Constitution.

Stuck Writing Your "Prevailing Legal Theory in the United States Today" Research Paper?

View All Our Example Prevailing Legal Theory in the United States Today Research Paper

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

For example, the largely conservative Roberts Court recently made one of the broadest-sweeping decisions in history -- "the justices overturned a ban on letting companies and unions use their own funds to produce their own campaign ads. The decision also eliminated the so-called McCain-Feingold ban on issue-oriented ads within 30 days of a primary and 60 days of a general election" (Supreme Court OKs corporate campaign contributions, 2010, PBS)

"By contrast 'broad construction' looks to what someone thinks was the 'intent' of the framers' language and expands and interprets the language extensively to meet current standards of human conduct and complexity of society" (Sollum 2009). In general, this is by far the most common legal point-of-view held by mainstream politicians and scholars. However, popular support for different legal philosophies varies widely, depending upon the character of the electorate. For example, strict construction jurists tend to interpret the Second Amendment as prohibiting any form of major restriction on guns. Politicians from areas afflicted with urban crime tend to support handgun restrictions while politicians from rural areas where hunting is common do not (Jones 2008). Likewise, many politicians say that they support a woman's right to choice, even while….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Prevailing Legal Theory In The United States Today" (2011, May 25) Retrieved June 7, 2026, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/prevailing-legal-theory-united-states-today-45003

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Prevailing Legal Theory In The United States Today" 25 May 2011. Web.7 June. 2026. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/prevailing-legal-theory-united-states-today-45003>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Prevailing Legal Theory In The United States Today", 25 May 2011, Accessed.7 June. 2026,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/prevailing-legal-theory-united-states-today-45003
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example