Private Security and Law Essay

Total Length: 722 words ( 2 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 4

Page 1 of 2

Private Security and the Law

Private security operatives are held liable for their actions based on existing federal and state laws. Potential liability for these operatives occur when attempting to stop or arrest criminals or when carrying out their daily operations. The most common potential liability issues for private security operatives are assault and battery. In addition, private security operatives can be found guilty under vicarious liability for the torts of another and for a violation of 42 U.S.C. 1983 (Reid, 2017). An example of a recent court case involving private security operatives accused or found liable for a 42 U.S.C. 1983 violation and under vicarious liability for the torts of another is State v. Santiago (2009).

In this case, the defendant Luis Santiago was involved in a verbal altercation at the Coronado Mall on July 20, 2005 in Albuquerque. Following the altercation, Santiago was stopped by security guards as he attempted to leave the mall. The guards pinned him down, handcuffed him, and searched his pockets where they found a pill bottle with approximately four grams of cocaine. At the suppression hearing, the District Court suppressed Santiago’s cocaine and his inculpatory statements, which was later upheld by the Court of Appeals on the premise that security guards were state actors subjected to the restrictions of the Fourth Amendment (FindLaw, 2010).
With regards to vicarious liability for the torts of another,…

[…… parts of this paper are missing, click here to view the entire document ]

…their employees. The company could be found vicarious liable on the premise that it did not adequately prepare the security guards on how to follow due process when dealing with a suspected criminal. Yee (2018) state that under the doctrine of vicarious liability, a security guard’s employer can be found liable for the actions of his/her security guards. In addition to vicarious liability, these security guards can be found liable for a 42 U.S.C. 1983 violation. When apprehending and carrying away the suspected shoplifter, the security guards deprived him of his rights and privileges by failure to follow due process. Therefore, the private security guards violated the due process rights granted to this individual by the Fourth Amendment….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Private Security And Law" (2019, March 24) Retrieved May 16, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/private-security-law-2174925

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Private Security And Law" 24 March 2019. Web.16 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/private-security-law-2174925>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Private Security And Law", 24 March 2019, Accessed.16 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/private-security-law-2174925