Report for Quantitative Analysis Analysis

Total Length: 2389 words ( 8 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 3

Page 1 of 8

AbstractThe Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey, which took place in 2018, was used to get input from public employees across a variety of specialties and occupational categories. Both nominal and ordinal data were present in the survey findings. Over 500,000 people responded, with a balance of both sexes and academic levels ranging from less than a bachelor\'s degree to degrees higher than a bachelor\'s degree. The Mann-Whitney U test was used in one of the two studies, while the Kruskal-Wallis test was used in the other. The Mann-Whitney U test results show that the null hypothesis is not accepted because p
To establish the statistical significance in two different regions, two nonparametric investigations were carried out. The Mann-Whitney U test was employed to assess significance in the initial research area. The Mann-Whitney U test is less powerful than the Independent t test, but it should still be employed if the presumptions can be met (Cronk, 2020). The Kruskal-Wallis test was utilized in the second area of research. The other nonparametric test used to compare data from a minimum of three groups on a dependent variable with at least one ordinal level is Kruskal-Wallis. Kruskal-Wallis H-tests are used to check if samples come from the same population similarly to the one-way ANOVA (Cronk, 2020).Theory/ Literature ReviewThe satisfaction of employees is shown to be correlated with successful leadership behaviour such as providing encouragement and training for advancement, and the supervisor\'s courteous interactions with the workers. Employees have…

[…… parts of this paper are missing, click here to view the entire document ]

…abilities, which is the answer to the first research question. There is still a sizable percentage of the employer population which does not give women the same opportunities in the job as they do to men, even in the present period when equality, inclusion, and diversity in the workplace are key themes. In the public sector, this is likewise typical and accurate. It has been found that women in public work, particularly in the armed forces, have less opportunities to show leadership and, as a result, fewer opportunities for progression than their male colleagues (Bader et al., 2018). Although these patterns are shifting, fewer possibilities still exist as of the time of this survey in.According to the findings for the other research question, whether or not supervisors give workers a chance to show off their leadership abilities varies in a statistically significantly manner based on educational level. According to Watts et al. (2021), the higher the employee\'s level of education, the more probable it is that the supervisor will let them show their leadership potential. This test\'s findings are reasonable. It is assumed that an employee will have a broader knowledge base to handle the numerous responsibilities and obstacles at work with increase in education.ConclusionThe two tests that were utilized to answer the research questions enable the researcher to learn more about how managers of subordinate staff operate. In the public sector, treating women differently and providing them less opportunities than men is practically a tradition. Because the practice happens to be rather widespread, it\'s possible that supervisors—even female supervisors—do not realize the prejudice they are engaging in. As opposed to the first test, the second test gives employees the chance to exhibit the tools and abilities they have learnt, potentially opening up prospects for promotion. Grouping the same data on educational attainment by age group could be another interesting association to investigate. However, while gender identification is not a suitable metric for managers to utilize in seeking to permit staff to show leadership capacity, educational advancement happens to be a significant metric. In order to identify any cycle changes that can have an impact on a company\'s success, public administrators can use quantifiable research. It was determined through the use of statistics that there is a statistically significant difference in opinion regarding whether the supervisor of a federal agency gives a worker opportunities to showcase his or her leadership abilities.….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Report For Quantitative Analysis" (2023, April 30) Retrieved May 18, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/report-quantitative-2178543

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Report For Quantitative Analysis" 30 April 2023. Web.18 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/report-quantitative-2178543>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Report For Quantitative Analysis", 30 April 2023, Accessed.18 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/report-quantitative-2178543