Patient Satisfaction and Design

Total Length: 2415 words ( 8 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 14

Page 1 of 8

Inpatient Whiteboards

This study is a theoretical framework exploring whiteboard use preferences and recommendations for patient-centered care and communication through whiteboard use.

This study is a theoretical framework exploring whiteboard use, script-based communication, and hourly rounding to evaluate effectiveness of care associated with pain management and patient satisfaction.

The study utilizes a conceptual framework.

This article uses a conceptual framework that provides a literature review

Conceptual framework

Conceptual Framework

Conceptual Framework

A 3-week pilot involving multidisciplinary whiteboard use

The setting is Stanford University Medical Center

Sample characteristics (# of patients) Patients available for the pilot were 104 patients: 56 from inpatient units with use of whiteboards and 48 from inpatient units with no use of white boards.

internal medical residents were also surveyed.

Design: The study involved a semi-structured interview.

Setting: The interview took place in a pediatric urban academic hospital inpatient surgical service

Sample characteristics (# of patients) The number of people interviewed were 29 families.

Design: The researchers used a prospective, quasi-experimental pretest -- posttest design

Setting: Researchers used two units in a hospital situated in an academic health sciences center (southern U.S.)

Sample characteristics (# of patients) Medical personnel within the units were used for data collection.

Design: Review

Setting: Hospital

Sample characteristics (# of patients) No patients used, presentation type of article. Obstetric whiteboards implemented. This was a presentation that offered implementation, outcomes, and evaluation. No studies used.

Design: Data-collection Study using surveys

Setting: Pediatric emergency department

Sample characteristics (# of patients) Data collection came from two weeks of nursing call bell activation data. While no participants, 200 pre-and post opinion surveys served as the basis of the results of the study.

Design: Review of literature and replication and quasi-experimental study

Setting: No real setting

Sample characteristics (# of patients) N/R

Design: Evidence-based quality improvement project

design

Setting: Hospital

Sample characteristics (# of patients) 110 bed sample

Design: Systematic Review

Setting: Not Applicable

Sample characteristics (# of patients) Not Applicable

Design:

Setting: Medical Surgical Unit

Sample characteristics (# of patients) No real number of patients or patient bed determined

Design:

Setting: Lehigh Valley Health Network

Sample characteristics (# of patients) 125 non-nursing providers and 33 care givers

Design: No design as this is a presentation

Setting: Postpartum Stay

Sample characteristics (# of patients) 4 mother-baby units

Design: A microsystem assessment of two inpatient medical-surgical wards.

Setting: medical facility

Sample characteristics (# of patients) Not Applicable

Design: Action Research Design using qualitative information

Setting: Southern California Hospitals

Sample characteristics (# of patients) 11 hospitals

Design: Not Applicable

Setting: Not Applicable

Sample characteristics (# of patients) Not Applicable

The major variable was white board use and it was measured through patient satisfaction, communication, and estimated discharge date. The patients were the dependent variable and the white board use was the independent variable.

T-tests were performed along with one-way ANOVA.

The major variable was white board use and the patients were the dependent variable. While there was no control group, information from the interview was turned into quantitative data using descriptive stats.


The independent variables were whiteboard use, script-based communication, and hourly rounding. It was measured through patient satisfaction examined through effectiveness of pain management. No quantitative analysis was performed.

Researchers used the Press Ganey and the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and System (HCAHPS) surveys. No variables discussed.

The independent variable was hourly rounding with the dependent variables being call bell activations. Vendor-collected survey results consisted of the main form of data collection with one-way ANOVA interpretation.

The independent variable in this study was hourly rounding with dependent variables being fall prevention, patient satisfaction, and call light usage.

The independent variable was pain care toolkits with dependent variables being pain management and patient satisfaction. Through SWOT analysis and Chi-Square analysis, researcher analyzed data.

Independent variable was nursing rounds and dependent variables were patient satisfaction and reduction of patient falls.

Independent variable was nursing rounds and dependent variables was reduction of patient falls. Study used Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems domain scores to assess effectiveness of hourly rounds.

Independent variable is white boards and dependent variables are patient satisfaction and communication. Audit implementation included: Twelve templates: Medical/Surgical, Critical Care, Transitional Skilled Unit, Pediatrics, Labor and Delivery, Labor and Delivery Triage, NICU, Emergency Department, ED-17th Street, ED-Children's, Mom/Baby, and Perinatal.

Main variable is white board use and the dependent variables are postpartum units and patients in those units. Information was collected through surveys.

Main variable is personalized whiteboard use and dependent variable is patient satisfaction. Researcher used Press-Ganey scores for statistical analysis.

Main variable is hourly rounds and dependent variables were participants in the phone interview. Qualitative data was analyzed for themes.

No variables as this is an expert opinion article.

Using whiteboards led to patients knowing the name of their physician, objectives for admission, estimated discharge date, as well as improved satisfaction overall with hospital stay. The actual numbers were (0.0001, 0.0016, and 0.0242) respectively.

From the families interviewed, two-thirds of respondents reported the use of white board and over half were informed by staff (52%). Those that used whiteboards were six times more actively using it than those who used it as a visual reference. Other analysis pointed to 42% of that group in which parents wrote on the white board. From that 42%, 80% only had contact information.

Whiteboard use, and the other forms of communication elicited consistent and clear communication with patients' creative a positive effect in pain management and thus patient satisfaction.

No quantitative analysis was performed. Qualitative results suggest obstetric whiteboards improved communication.

Not enough quantitative analysis was performed. However, results suggest hourly rounding had no or minimal positive impact on call bell activation. Results show accidental call bell activation increased with introduction of hourly rounding.

Results suggest hourly rounding alone does not offer a decrease in call light usage, or increases patient satisfaction. It does help fall prevention, but not in a significant manner.

Pain care toolkits are beneficial to pain management and thus increased.....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Patient Satisfaction And Design" (2017, February 17) Retrieved May 14, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/patient-satisfaction-design-2164352

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Patient Satisfaction And Design" 17 February 2017. Web.14 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/patient-satisfaction-design-2164352>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Patient Satisfaction And Design", 17 February 2017, Accessed.14 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/patient-satisfaction-design-2164352