Sanctity of Life and Utilitarianism Term Paper

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 635 words ( 2 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1+

Page 1 of 2

SINGER

Euthanasia

The Singer debate 'are there some lives not worth living:'

The sanctity of life and utilitarianism

Professor Peter Singer is a well-known utilitarian who advocates the right of parents to commit infanticide based upon utilitarian premises: he argues that the resources expended by keeping such children alive are too great and it would make more sense to allow families to adopt instead healthy children with a greater chance at happiness. Disability activist Harriet McBryde Johnson, who says that she would not be alive if this type of calculus had been employed notes: "But like the protagonist in a classical drama, Singer has his flaw. It is his unexamined assumption that disabled people are inherently 'worse off,' that we 'suffer,' that we have lesser 'prospects of a happy life'" (Johnson 2003: 12). However, Johnson also argues against assisted suicide entirely, even with the consent of the person who feels that his or her life is no longer worth living. She argues instead for a society where care is more available to those that need it: "As a society, we should pay workers to provide that care, in the home" (Johnson 2003: 9).

Philosopher James Rachels provides a counterbalancing argument to Johnson's, namely the fact that for many people their lives are agonizing and consciously experienced as not worth living.

Stuck Writing Your "Sanctity of Life and Utilitarianism" Term Paper?

View All Our Example Sanctity of Life and Utilitarianism Term Paper

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

The problem with infanticide, Rachels would likely counter, is that the infant has no ability to consent as to whether his or her life is meaningful at life's beginning. This is very different at the end of life, or after a time of profound suffering. Rachels admits that a strictly utilitarian argument along the lines of Singer can lead one to untenable premises, such as the notion that someone who was miserable would be better off dead. However, a possible response to this objection would be that psychological misery is a transient state while a terminal illness cannot, by definition, be alleviated. The objective of utilitarianism is not the erasure of all pain but the spirit of utilitarianism does call upon us to ask the question: if someone is dying from a terminal illness and wishes to die, is societal happiness promoted by forcing him or her to use heroic measures? Signer would no doubt add that resources are finite and could be better used to prolong the lives of those who actually wished to live.

Ultimately, the question 'are….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Sanctity Of Life And Utilitarianism" (2014, December 13) Retrieved June 4, 2026, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/sanctity-life-utilitarianism-2154120

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Sanctity Of Life And Utilitarianism" 13 December 2014. Web.4 June. 2026. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/sanctity-life-utilitarianism-2154120>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Sanctity Of Life And Utilitarianism", 13 December 2014, Accessed.4 June. 2026,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/sanctity-life-utilitarianism-2154120
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example