Student Performance Essay

Total Length: 1688 words ( 6 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 5

Page 1 of 6

IAQ and Education: How does Indoor Air Quality Impact Student Health and Performance?

Historically, student performance was thought to be the result of the direct factors the student encountered in the classroom environment. As long as the student was taught in an appropriate manner, the prevailing thought was that the student would be capable of learning. However, it became apparent that students could be exposed to the same curriculum under tremendously different circumstances with tremendously different results. Therefore, educators and the general public began to be aware of other factors that impacted student performance. These factors could be seemingly obvious, such as whether the student had literate parents at home to help with school work, or more subtle, such as childhood malnutrition and its deleterious impact on learning. One of the concerns that many modern educators and environmentalists are beginning to examine is the interrelationship between indoor air quality (IAQ) and student performance. It is well established that poor indoor air quality can impact health. However, the impact of poor air quality on school performance goes beyond the impact on health. Poor IAQ can impact school performance directly and indirectly in two major ways, first, by causing illness and second, by reducing the ability to performance specific mental tasks.

Poor IAQ is linked to illness in a wide variety of ways. While people think of lack of performance from illness due to sick leave, perhaps the most pervasive performance problem is actually linked to underperformance that is attributable to IAQ-related health problems. There are many symptoms of mild distress that are linked to IAQ; they may not amount to a diagnosable illness, but still result in people not feeling well. Symptoms may include lethargy, headaches, sore throats, itchy eyes, or similar mild symptoms that are not sufficient to warrant time away from work, but do interfere with performance. "When these types of symptoms are made worse by being in a building, they are referred to as 'sick building syndrome'" (EPA, 2000, p.2).

Some buildings cause health problems that are more severe and contribute to more than mild discomfort. Some of this is due to sensitivity in the child. For example, children with asthma may be especially sensitive to buildings with IAQ problems. Other times, the quality of the air in the building is so compromised that there are widespread illnesses in the school as a result. The potential illnesses include respiratory infections, allergic diseases from biological contaminants, asthma responses, reactions to chemicals, and also potential mold reactions (EPA, 2000, p.2). Asthma and allergy responses may seem limited to people who do not suffer from the problems, but they are actually a major educational barrier for people who experience them. "Asthma-related illness is one of the leading causes of school absenteeism, accounting for over 10 million missed school days per year" (EPA, 2000, p.2). If the illness rates in a school are high enough, a school may even have to close during the remediation process, in order to prevent exposing the staff, faculty, and students to further health risks.

In addition to being directly liked to health because poor air quality can have a direct impact on health, IAQ is indirectly linked to health because indoor air temperature and relative humidity are related to the airborne levels of molds and bacteria, which are related to the amount of illness. When air is not properly filtered, disease is more likely to spread. These are secondary diseases, many of which are highly communicable, like colds and flus, which may not be directly attributable to IAQ, but which find favorable growth conditions in the same environments that promote negative IAQ. Moreover, this means that schools face a greater risk of low IAQ in the immediate aftermath of a flood, typhoon, or other natural disaster when standing water and other water damage places the facility at risk. Internationally, this has proven to be a health risk to students in the Philippines as they have returned to school after typhoons (Pittman, 2014, p.3). Domestically, this can be seen as a significant problem impacting students in New Orleans in the aftermath of Katrina. Not surprisingly, these problems are compounded in poor areas where the districts may lack sufficient funding for remediation that would fix the water damage and improve the air quality.

Of course, not everyone in a building is always impacted by sick building syndrome because people have different tolerance levels. However, in a school setting, it is important to keep in mind that every child is impacted when IAQ impacts any students or educators in the school environment.
When educators are impacted, the students are not getting the full benefit of the teachers' expertise and education, and are therefore being cheated out of a portion of their school experience because they are not getting the best from those educators. If teachers are frequently absent, then students are taught by substitutes, which leads to a lack of consistency. If other students have high absent rates, then teachers may find it difficult to move on to new material, which means all of the class falls behind in the curriculum. The result is that everyone in the school is impacted by a sick building, not simply those who are physically susceptible to its impact.

That does not mean that a school with IAQ problems necessarily dooms children to poor performance. Just as with other educational challenges, the reality is that there are steps that educators and parents can take to help ameliorate the impact of an IAQ on a child's education. However, these steps should be a temporary measure while IAQ is being remediated, because long-term environmental stressors may be too difficult for a child to overcome. While many studies on sick building syndrome have focused on adults, the evidence suggests that even mild discomfort results in people reporting a perceived decline in their own performance levels, and there is no reason to expect that children would not also experience a similar decline in performance.

Of course, one cannot simply translate the office or industrial setting to the education environment. In the educational environment, poor IAQ is generally not caused by the same factors that lead to poor IAQ in industrial applications. Instead, poor IAQ in schools is often caused by factors that are easily remediated or prevented. The two commonly identified sources of air pollution in the educational setting are laboratories and art settings, though gyms and any other moisture-creating or moisture-laden activity may also provide an opportunity for bacteria or mold growth. Poor indoor air quality is generally going to be a result of failing to maintain a healthy indoor environment. Practices that can contribute to poor IAQ include: failure to control pollution sources like art supplies and laboratory activities; failure to control temperature and humidity; failure to control and moisture and clean up spills; failure to ventilate each classroom adequately; failure to adequately maintain or clean; and using excessive pesticides (EPA, 2000, p.1).

One of the problems contributing to poor IAQ in schools is the fact that there is very little regulation about air quality in the educational environment. According to Shaughnessy et al., "few states regulate the school indoor environment, and fewer still have minimum ventilation standards for schools" (2006, p.465). What this means is that students have few legal protections when it comes to air quality, and specifically few legal protections with regards to the appropriate mix of fresh air, even though adequate ventilation is well-established as a critical component for IAQ. In fact, many schools have been intentionally designed to have poor ventilation, although the goal was not to limit fresh air. Instead, energy saving cooling systems that were installed to increase efficiency had the unintended side-effect of reducing appropriate ventilation, and have been linked to sick building syndrome (Schneider, 2002, p.1). The rate of fresh air in many of these schools, especially older schools that were built during the 1970s energy crises, fails to comply with the fresh air recommendations required for adult workers, but those laws do not apply to school students.

Unfortunately, this lack of legal protection seems aimed at hitting the most vulnerable members in the population. Schools students are seen as highly at-risk for two reasons. First, school budgets are constantly under attacks, so that building are frequently built inexpensively and without adequate ventilation systems that would ensure appropriate IAQ. Furthermore, budgetary hits often target maintenance and janitorial personnel that would be responsible for the improvements that would help insure that the IAQ was maintained at healthy levels (Mendell and Heath, 2005, p.27). In addition, children often have a greater susceptibility to diseases and illnesses, especially communicable diseases because of developing immune systems (Mendell and Health, 2005, p, 27). Therefore, they may be even more vulnerable to complications from sick building syndrome than adults.

Clearly, indoor air quality has an impact on student performance and that impact goes beyond simply the health impact on students who are vulnerable to the illnesses linked to sick building syndrome. All….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


Related Essays

The Impact of Resource Management on Student Performance

and staff reductions. Without compromising the integrity of the school’s educational quality, these cuts are meant to enable the school to live within its means while still providing top-notch service and educational opportunities. Students and faculty may notice minor inconveniences in terms of hours of when the science lab is open or the amount of assistance available in classrooms—but with time adjustments will be made to enable these changes to be accepted with positivity. Student Performance The financial recommendations made herein will not adversely affect the instructional program provided to students. Assistants have been eliminated from the grade 1 level and the kindergarten level as well as the special education classroom—but the main teachers remain, and with the main teachers implementing the Montessori method to help students learn on their own and advance on their own at these levels, volunteers (parents of students) will be asked to help as is consistent with this method (Mangal, 2007). In short, student performance is not expected to… Continue Reading...

Parental Involvement That Boost Young Childrens Academic Performance

Similarly, Gonzalez, Borders, Hines, et al. (2017) demonstrated that culturally specific parental involvement types could also correlate with student performance outcomes. Particularly, the study showed that when school counselors invited Latino parents to involve themselves actively in their children’s education, they responded well. However, no research is yet to unearth the kind of parental involvement that is required for kids who are in their 3rd and 7th grade. The purpose of this study… Continue Reading...

Does Testing Overlook the Importance of Long Term Learning

being controlled by high-stakes standardized testing regimes and teachers are increasingly being held accountable for student performance. As a result, it is little wonder that there has been a growing tendency on the part of many educators to "teach to the test." Indeed, and as also underscored by the epigraph above, the classroom testing process itself can be viewed as being counterproductive to the extent that it detracts from long-term learning and the development of the critical thinking skills young people need today to be competitive in the workplace. This paper reviews the literature to demonstrate how testing tends to overlook the importance of long-term… Continue Reading...

Knowledge and Understanding in Sports

techniques to ensure validity and reliability when measuring student performance. This allows for a fuller sense of the manner in which knowledge was presented. Quantitative measures are best (Fallowfield, 2004), but qualitative measures can also be used to assess subjective understanding (Gratton & Jones, 2003; Gratton & Jones, 2004). For quantitative measurements, Hughes and Franks (2004) recommend notational analysis, while Pill (2013) advocates taking note of students’ understanding using contextual measures which require a qualitative approach. To assess understanding, one must be able to see whether the learner is able to find problems to solve not just solve… Continue Reading...

Curriculum Evaluation Plan Essay

of stakeholder needs, an analysis of student performance data with NJCCCS/CP Indicators, and a description of curricular, cross content, co-curricular, and extracurricular content is followed by a discussion of procedures for curriculum design, approval, and steps for implementation. Finally, a description of the procedures that will be used for curriculum evaluation and the 5-year evaluation cycle that will be used for subjects is followed by a discussion concerning the technology tools for teaching and learning and corresponding professional development needs. It is the goal of this revised curriculum to provide Haddonfield’s students with the educational background… Continue Reading...

Pilot Study on Absenteeism and Achievement

can see that whenever absenteeism was recorded to be high, the student performance in reading was highly affected. Take for example, when the days absent was 4 the students’ performance in reading was 297 while in math the students’ performance was recorded to be 275. When the days absent was recorded to be 45 the students’ performance in reading was also recorded to be high at 295 as compared to the students math performance which was recorded to be 289. When there was no absenteeism, the math performance was on the other hand highly recorded as compared to that of reading.… Continue Reading...

Correlation Between Variables Understanding Business Forecasts

Variable A: Number of classrooms connected to the internet Variable B: Student performance as measured by standardized test scores Correlation: Minimal correlation Reason: The study came to the conclusion that "despite the noticeable increase in classroom Internet connections, the authors find very little evidence that the program has any impact on student achievement, as measured by test scores in a variety of subjects" (Golsbee and Gurayan 2005). Variable A: teachers' comfort level with the internet Variable B: ability of teachers to use internet effectively with their students Correlation: Positive correlation Reason: the study found that the teachers' inability to work with… Continue Reading...

Teaching Experience

in that here it was also used to evaluate the success of the project. Personalized learning strategies helped to boost student performance and technology assisted greatly in this boost. Action Plan… Continue Reading...

sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Student Performance" (2015, March 23) Retrieved May 14, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/student-performance-2149387

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Student Performance" 23 March 2015. Web.14 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/student-performance-2149387>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Student Performance", 23 March 2015, Accessed.14 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/student-performance-2149387