Whistle Blowing and Court Case Study

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 747 words ( 2 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 2

Page 1 of 2

Whistle-Blower Case Study Based on Oklahoma Law

It may appear common-sense that Janet and Darla are whistle-blowers; they saw something wrong at their workplace (another employee potentially stealing drugs and committing fraud), and notified their employer. However, while they may have effectively blown the whistle on potential fraud, they are also working in a state with "at will" employment laws, which states employers can fire employees for any reason (Bennett-Alexander & Hartman, 2014).

When the Federal court looks at the appeal they will need to assess whether or not Janet and Darla have met the requirements to be classified as whistle-blowers, and assess whether or not their dismissal could be seen as retaliation for whistle-blowing (Bennett-Alexander & Hartman, 2014). If classified as whistle-blowers they would be protected from retaliation by the employer. The case to consider is that of Groce v. Foster, 880 P.2d902 (Okla. 1994), which gave five exceptions which would prevent whistle blowers being fired under the 'at will' doctrine, the relevant exception requires them to show that they have reported an act that public policy would discourse, and that the discharge was undertaken in bad faith, out of malice, or out of retaliation.

Examining this; there is little doubt that drug fraud would be discouraged under public policy.

Stuck Writing Your "Whistle Blowing and Court" Case Study?

View All Our Example Whistle Blowing and Court Case Study

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

Indeed, as required Janet and Darla are able to show that the actions they were reporting was also ready stated as against public policy in statutes. Therefore, the first element of the requirement is met.

The difficulty may be with the second element of the requirement. This is to show that the dismissal was linked to the whistle-blowing, and that it was either in retaliation, bad faith, or the result of malice. This can be a difficult assessment, as it requires the court to consider the underlying motivation of the person who dismissed them. The court may consider issues such as the proximity or potential relationship of the dismissal to the whistle-blowing event, and the reasons given by the employer for the dismissal. In this case the reasons do create a direct link to the event, as Janet and Darla did not follow the procedures laid down for whistle blowing, instead of reporting their suspicions to the accused employees immediate superior, they reported it to a different manager, effectivity breaching protocol. Janet and Darla argued it was undertaken in this manner as they believed the accused to have a….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Whistle Blowing And Court" (2016, October 12) Retrieved June 5, 2026, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/whistle-blowing-court-2162737

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Whistle Blowing And Court" 12 October 2016. Web.5 June. 2026. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/whistle-blowing-court-2162737>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Whistle Blowing And Court", 12 October 2016, Accessed.5 June. 2026,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/whistle-blowing-court-2162737
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example