Court Proceedings Experience Premise year-old Nicholas Lindsay was charged for the murder of Officer David Crawford. Besides Lindsay's own confession to the murder, there is no other evidence that he committed the murder. Lindsay made this confess Continue Reading...
court of criminal appeals of Texas, PD-0307-09 Ronald Wilson, and appellant v the State of Texas. (CCA (a), n. d.) The court of Appeals case was: 04-07-00737-CR, and was affirmed. The appeal came from the trial court: 290th District Court of the Bex Continue Reading...
At this time the court may decide to vacate the TRO or to convert it into a preliminary injunction. (Ibid.) What is a Court Order Used for? A court order may be used for: Restraining a party from changing the status quo until the decision of the Continue Reading...
Thorn Legal Memo Under current Michigan law, Joseph Thorn will most likely be granted custodial rights to his son Ryan. The family court evaluates a parent's right for custody of a child using Mich. Comp. Law Section 722. In particular, the court d Continue Reading...
4Giles v. CommonwealthCite as 672 S.E. 2d 879 (Va. 2009)Facts of CaseDefendant, Christopher Lee Giles, took part in breaking and entering a house on September 28, 2005, in the City of Martinsville. The house belonged to Oscar Thornton, which was an i Continue Reading...
Murder Trial of Nicholas Lindsey, March 2012 Factual and Procedural Background On the evening of February 21, 2011, Police Officer David Crawford of the St. Petersburg, Florida police department was fatally shot while investigating a report of a s Continue Reading...
court process for the below mentioned case would be either litigation by judge or by jury. The facets that we are looking at include the actions of Mr. Smith and if these actions actually deserve the sentence that he received. The process would enta Continue Reading...
Courts in World Cultures -- a Report on China China Discrimination is one of the most critical issues of the present times. It refers to the societal practices and behaviors which deprive a certain group of people or minorities from enjoying equal Continue Reading...
Antitrust I don't have the proper bibliographical info for the book chapters. I noted the number from the two PDFs of the book where appropriate. You might wish to add the proper info and change the notes to fit. MARKET CONDITIONS in the U.S.: It w Continue Reading...
Further, these individuals are able to work and contribute to their own keep as well as pay child support. The timeliness of the process of the Death Penalty Appeal is one of the measures that have attempted to be built into the justice system to ba Continue Reading...
Kennedy, aged 46, was traveling in a convoy when he was shot. He was in a limousine with an open top, passing the Book Depository of Texas School Building, in downtown Dallas at around 12:30 P.M. Kennedy's wife, Jacqueline Kennedy, the governor o Continue Reading...
Amy's Story As a family preservation worker, I have been sent to Amy's house because the social services agency has received police reports of abuse against Amy, and because there are two children in the family this is a legal cause for the visit. I Continue Reading...
Police Report On the afternoon of February 8, 2007, I received a dispatch call on a potential homicide at 1100 SE Lynn Boulevard, Prineville, Oregon. This location is the local high school, named Crook County High School. The information given to me Continue Reading...
C.O.R.E. And Its Role in the Black Freedom Struggle Nearly one hundred forty years ago, a tall, and not very good-looking, bearded man stepped out onto a great, open field. His tired eyes wandered over the bloody ground, over the earth covered with Continue Reading...
Fine-Tuning Let us first consider the case of Tom, who is a comparatively younger person in the whole group consisting of Max, Jim and Lynne. He has recently joined the company and he tries to understand as to the company's practice of assessing th Continue Reading...
Reasonable Suspicion and 4th Amendment Law in U.S. v. Arvizu, 534 U.S. 266 (2001) Title and Citation: U.S. v. Arvizu, 534 U.S. 266 (2001) Type of Action: Review by the U.S. Supreme Court of a ruling made by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth C Continue Reading...
U.S. v. O'Hagan case Facts In the U.S. v. O'Hagan case, the defendant, James Herman O'Hagan, was a partner in a major Minneapolis firm, and was involved in a corporate acquisition as a representative of the acquiring corporation (Corley, et al., 20 Continue Reading...
Murphy v. Waterfront Commission, 378 U.S. 52 (1964) Title and Citation: Murphy v. Waterfront Commission, 378 U.S. 52 (1964) Type of Action: Review by the U.S. Supreme Court of a ruling made by the New Jersey State Supreme Court, which held that pe Continue Reading...
She has the right to call witnesses on her behalf and have them testify for her and she has the right to face and question any witnesses that are brought forth by the opposition. There are several possible alternative solutions to this problem. Th Continue Reading...
Steiney Richards, Petitioner v. Wisconsin The Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution prohibits police officers from conducting seizures and searches on a suspect's person or property, unless under the authorization of a judge. The case of Richards Continue Reading...
John Postal and the environmental protection agency and army corps John Pozsgai vs. The EPA Google the name 'John Pozsgai' and you will immediately summon up a series of articles from very divergent sources, some of which laud Pozsgai as a hero, o Continue Reading...
Case Brief: In this particular case, Mrs. Gregory, who is in this context the taxpayer, was keen on avoiding double taxation. As the owner of the stocks of United Mortgage Corp., an entity that held some stocks at Monitor Securities Corp, she desi Continue Reading...
Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) program. I chose this program because it is part of a nonprofit organization's attempt to prevent abused and neglected children from getting lost in the welfare system. For this reason, the program chooses cou Continue Reading...
Specialized courts are alternative courts that are narrowly focused in terms of the types of cases they hear. The judges that oversee these courts are considered to be experts in their fields. Cases that fall within their parameter are routed to them Continue Reading...
How does a court system cope with a “changing of the guard” when a new administration is elected and key executives and managers are replaced, and/or when policy changes direction as a new political party assumes power? The best coping t Continue Reading...
manager (pretrial diversion worker) in this case may adopt best practices in court-based diversion, categorized into 1) specialty mental health, and 2) traditional court. The major portion of literature concerning court-based diversion concentrates Continue Reading...
Of the five criteria set by the courts for the reliability test, which one do you believe to be the weakest? Why? The reliability criteria that have been developed as the science of eyewitness information advanced include the following: View, atte Continue Reading...
BUSINESS LAW Business Law: Case Law Analysis- Tort LawStep 1: Information Literacy SkillsParties before the court: Wael Musa (Plaintiff) vs. Carleton Condominium Corporation no. 255 (Defendant) (CanLii, 2022)Date of decision: 18-27 October 2021.Court Continue Reading...
Sarah Harris Referred Case: Steve Z, a 15-year-old truant student The subject in the given case is a chronic absentee from school --he regularly skips school without a valid reason, and has received a referral to a family court, which has ordered h Continue Reading...
BUSINESS CASE STUDIES Business Case Studies: Holiday Inn Franchising, Inc. vs. Hotel Associates, Inc. Court of Appeals of Arkansas 2011 Ark. App. 147, 382 S.W.3d 6 (2011)PartiesHoliday Inn Hotel (the defendant) and Hotel Associates Inc. (HAI) (the pl Continue Reading...
Freedom of Speech The Brandenburg Case The central holding in the Brandenburg case is the debate about whether suppressing hate speech or speeches that have the potential to incite violence is, in fact, violates the guarantee to freedom of speech a Continue Reading...
United States of America, Plaintiff -- Appellee, Ann W. McRee, Joseph H. Hale, Defendants -- Appellee. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Parties: United States of America (Plaintiff) v. McRee & Hale (Defendants) Facts: On Fe Continue Reading...
Tort In common law, a tort is a civic wrong that causes a plaintiff to suffer harm or loss which results in legal liability for the individual (defendant) who committed the tortious act. The goal of filing a tort claim is to receive a private civil r Continue Reading...
Kapoor G.K., (n.d). Business Law Including Company Law. Chapter 1 This book, in the isolated chapter 1 discusses the elaborate meaning of a contract and what makes up a legally binding contract. It discusses the elements of a contract in the context Continue Reading...
Diversity is increasingly becoming a serious HR issue for companies in the 21st century marketplace. Organizations have been forced to develop strategies for increasing the representation of minority groups and making their workplaces more favorable Continue Reading...
Harris D.O.B.: 03/29/1999 Gender: Male Ethnicity: Not Given Date of Evaluation: REASON FOR REFERRAL: Sam Harris is a 15-year-old male who was referred by the *(information not available regarding exact referral source, please insert) court for Continue Reading...
The case of State v. Ninham represents an important juncture in the discourse on juvenile justice, highlighting the complexities and ethical considerations surrounding the sentencing of juveniles to life without parole for heinous crimes. At the hear Continue Reading...
WEEK 1 CHAPTER REVIEW JOURNAL BLWeek 1 Chapter Review Journal BLQuestion 1In my opinion, if the Court were to hear a new flag burning case, it should follow precedent and find that setting the American flag ablaze essentially constitutes free speech Continue Reading...
