999 Search Results for Court Decisions in Other Cases
Global Nova Case Study
GlobalNova
A Case Study in Entrepreneurship and Corruption
Company Origins
GlobalNova was conceived by a Brazilian Engineer while working for IBM. He allied himself with a Brazilian Politician from the southernmost State of Continue Reading...
Ethics, Law Case, Critical Thinking
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act permits retaliation claims because they help to prevent situations in which workers who are unlawfully discriminated against pursue those discrimination law suits. Were Title VII Continue Reading...
Banyan Tree Case Study
While it was not until the 19th century that the term "brand" had the connotation of meaning a commercial trademark, the idea of individual styles and types of merchandise have been around at least since the written record. Fo Continue Reading...
Curious Case of Gary McKinnon
There is much controversy with regard to information in the digital age and Gary Mckinnon's case is especially intriguing when considering this discussion. The Scottish hacker is charged of having hacked into a U.S. dat Continue Reading...
Dementia
Case Study Review: A basis for interpersonal Practice
Communication is the process of conveying opinions and exchanging ideas in a way which enhances the interpersonal relationship between individuals. It is a skill that enables us to shar Continue Reading...
Johnson and Johnson issued a public relations response immediately naming their number one priority: to aggressively protect any consumer from the potential hazards that may be present in any of their family of products.
Symptoms of the Problem -- Continue Reading...
What are the recognized threats
Recognized threats on a national and international level include, expansion of international terrorism, as a result of universal fundamentalist Arab calls for violence against those who oppress Arabs. Israel is at t Continue Reading...
The appellate court applied the precedent of Saucier v. Katz (2001), which states the application of the qualified immunity test. According to Saucier, an officer can be stripped of qualified immunity protection only if their conduct violates a cons Continue Reading...
Religious Freedom-First Amendment
Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah
Religious Freedom is one of the key principles on which the foundation of our country was laid. United States has always supported and endorsed free exercise of re Continue Reading...
Retrieved 21 Mar. 2013 from http://www.justice.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/65mcrm.htm#9-65.700.
Doyle, Charles. (2011). Crimes of violence committed against federal official or employees: A brief overview of federal criminal law. C Continue Reading...
Can a student enforce the provisions of FERPA by suing a private university for damages under section 1983?
A jury awarded plaintiff compensatory and punitive damages on the FERPA claim. The Washington Court of Appeals reversed in relevant part, co Continue Reading...
U.S. Courts
Until Bob Woodward wrote his book, The Bretheren: Inside the Supreme Court (Woodward, 1996), the inner workings of the United States Supreme Court were considered off-limits. For nearly two hundred years no one had the courage to investi Continue Reading...
After the oral phase the court delivers its judgment, which
is final and binding upon all present without further claims for appeal
("International Court of Justice"). This part of the procedure regarding
both the written and oral phases, is similar Continue Reading...
Bond V. United States (2000)(529 U.S. 334, 146 L.Ed.2d 365)Facts of CaseSteven D. Bonds (petitioner) bag was searched by a US border patrol agent during a routine stop to check the immigration status of passengers on a bus. Bond was a passenger in th Continue Reading...
Alberty, the First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment in Defendant's favor, holding that under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e (Title VII of the Civil Rights Act) and P.R. Laws Ann. Tit. 29, 146 et seq. And 467 e Continue Reading...
The situations therefore are not analogous. I believe the Supreme Court also erred in finding that the knowingly corrupt act needed to be within the context of a specific investigation. If a criminal act is being undertaken, there is a reasonable ch Continue Reading...
Sneaky Pete Case
Answers to Jake Law's Questions
Jake Law is the prosecuting attorney in the armed robbery case of Sneaky Pete. In the current negotiation, Jake must resolve his issues with the defense attorney, Chris Vaughn and the Judge as well. Continue Reading...
Obtaining a warrant to take blood sample of a person suspected of drunk driving but has refused to take breath test takes longer time and undermines the essence of time in this process. The Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. together with other judge Continue Reading...
Supreme Court
In the landmark decision Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, the United States Supreme Court overturned the "separate but equal" standard adopted by the 1892 Plessy v. Ferguson. Until Brown v. Board of Education passed, American publi Continue Reading...
State v. Stark (1992)
Mr. Stark was the defendant in this case which concerned her action of infecting three women with HIV sexually. He tested positive for HIV, which was then confirmed twice by doing two other independent tests. As an ordinary pro Continue Reading...
Parties:
United States of America (plaintiff) v. Ramzi Ahmed Yousef, Eyad Ismoil and Abdul Hakim Murad (defendants)
Facts:
Ramzi Yousef, Eyad Ismoil also known as Eyad Ismail, and Abdul Hakim Murad also known as Saeed Ahmed were charged by the Uni Continue Reading...
Police Courts and Corrections
According to Merrill and Fox (1999) the total impact of substance abuse on Federal entitlement programs is more than $77 billion. This constitutes in excess of $66 billion directly associated with substance abuse. Furt Continue Reading...
In another case, New Jersey v TLO (1985), it was decided that teachers and administrators actually have somewhat expansive rights when it comes to determining if a student is in violation of school policy or the law. Specifically, when a student wa Continue Reading...
Supreme Court cases (Muller V. Oregon) women's right
Why it was an issue of national importance
The Muller v. Oregon case was among the most crucial Supreme Court cases in the U.S. during the progressive regime. The case held an Oregon law that lim Continue Reading...
Family Law Act a court must take into Account ' the best interest of the child'. What does this mean? What are the factors the court is to consider in determining the best interests of the child and how do these operate? (200-500 words)
In short, t Continue Reading...
Ethics
The Terri Schiavo case was an unusual incident where a person who should have been removed from life support long ago was sustained due to federal and public intervention. The case instigates moral and ethical questions of decision to end lif Continue Reading...
Belize Telecom Court Case
When the government of Belize restructured the nation's telecommunication services company it wanted to privatize the company while still maintaining a certain amount of control. To further this goal, the government created Continue Reading...
People v. Goetz (1986)
1. Give an overview of the case.
The controversial People v. Goetz (1986) involves the Defendant, Bernhard Goetz (Defendant) who shot and injured four young black men on a subway train in the Bronx. Four black youths, Troy Can Continue Reading...
Specific Performance by Virtue of Substantial Performance -- Stainbrook v. Low
In this case, the purchaser or real estate sought to enforce the specific performance of a contract for the sale real estate. Specifically, the plaintiff-buyer had ente Continue Reading...
Key Success Factors in the Global Auto Rental Industry
Pursuing increasingly higher levels of inventory optimization and logistics performance will continue to reduce operations costs for low-cost car rental providers globally (Fink, Reiners, 2006 Continue Reading...
They're what journalists are supposed to explain. 'We'll focus on the issues' is the vow in virtually every newsroom in virtually every campaign. Ideally, it means producing comprehensive, thoughtful analyses of candidates' positions on economic gro Continue Reading...
Mediation in family law cases is recognized as a viable alternative to the courtroom because it has proven to work effectively in most cases if both parties make a reasonable effort to solve their disputes. Approximately 98% of family law cases settl Continue Reading...
Jury Selection Process, Sequestration, Verdict and Relevant Controversies:
OJ Simpson's case had already set the record for being the longest jury trial in the history of California even before the commencement of closing arguments. For a better p Continue Reading...
CAD Mex Case Study
Globalism has resulted in a number of changes for the economic viability of the modern corporation. As both the developed world evolves in their new market structure, the developing world adds to the pressures and changes necessar Continue Reading...
Knorpp v Hale
981 SW 2nd 469 (Tex. App. 1998)
Knorpp v Hale is a case from Texas that deals with the issues of responsibility towards an individual coming onto one's personal property and then experiencing a danderous or negative situation. In this Continue Reading...
Indianapolis vs. Edmond
531 U.S. 32, 121S. ct.447, 148 L. Ed. 2D 333(2000)
Facts: In an attempt to discover and intercept unlawful narcotics on transit across the city, Indianapolis police implemented a highway checkpoint program, where motorists w Continue Reading...
BLm - Bureau of Land Management
Environmental Impact Statement
FLPMA - Federal Land Policy Management Act
NEPA - National Environmental Policy Act
RFRA - Religious Freedom Restoration Act
Environmental Justice Case of South Fork Band Council of Continue Reading...
WEEK 1Week 3: Case AnalysisYoung v. Becker & Poliakoff, Court of Appeals of Florida, Fourth District (2012)PartiesThe plaintiff was Jacquelyn N. Young (the appellant), and the other party involved was the law associate firm, Becker & Poliakoff (the a Continue Reading...
" In short, when it comes to the First Amendment, greater issues are at stake beyond the immediate interests of the corporations in question. There must be a compelling state interest to limit freedom of expression.
Why doesn't it make a difference Continue Reading...