Social Policy Research Proposal

Total Length: 2015 words ( 7 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 7

Page 1 of 7

War on Drugs

Four decades ago, the American government declared a war on drugs. As has been the case with some other American wars, the battle continues with the American government continuously investing money and resources in the stubborn hope of defeating its enemy. The enemy persists with government and violators playing a cop-robber squall, people continuing to harm themselves, the government raising taxes and steepness of penalties, and the jails and social programs filling -- not emptying -- with substance abusers. This despite a plethora of research, interventions, material on the subject, conventions, legal policies, brainstorming, and so forth

The essay suggests that it may be time to consider a wiser, more effective, strategy.

American Policy on Substance Abuse: History & Scope of Issue

Four decades ago, the American government declared a war on drugs. The initiatus came typically enough with Nixon who still fighting one war decided to fight another with one with drugs. In a special message to Congress, in July 14, 1969, President Richard Nixon identified drug abuse as "a serious national threat" and as "public enemy No. 1." (NPR) Nixon created the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to coordinate the efforts of all other agencies. Commerce and use of psychoactive drugs such as cocaine and opium had been frequent and legal until then, but, starting with Nixon's proclamation, various legal regulations and restrictions against drugs were introduced, dropped, and introduced again, until in 1970 Congress enacted the federal Controlled Substances Act (the "CSA") that repealed most of the earlier federal legislation and became the basis for contemporary American drug policy.

Drugs are categorized into two sectors: Schedule 1 drug, including marijuana, LSD, heroin, and peyote, are permitted only for carefully licensed research purposes, whilst Schedule 2 drugs (cocaine, opium, morphine, meperidine (Demerol) and codeine) are exclusively accepted for medical use (Dolin, 2001). In 1984, the Comprehensive Crime Control Act was implemented, closely followed by the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 and the Anti-Drug Abuse Amendment Act of 1988 which incrementally raised federal penalties for drug-related offences and activities and tightened drug-regulation procedures, whilst the Office of National Drug Control Policy, whose director is called the 'Drug Tsar' was instituted in 1988 under the National Narcotics Leadership Act (Ibid.). Starting from 2000, a Drug Dealer Liability Act that transferred liability on drug dealers for the harm caused by proscribed drugs was accepted by 13 states, and penalty for drug dealers who involved children in drug transactions was increased under the Protecting Our Children from Drugs Act (2000). Other initiatives included the Drug Free America Act of 2001, the Domestic Narcotic Demand Reduction Act of 2001, and the Drug Treatment and Research Enhancement Act of 2001 (Dolin, 2001).

Perspectives & Analysis of Policy

American legal penalties for drug involvement are severe. Third felony drug offences involving Substance I drugs carry a mandatory life sentence without possibility of release. The penalties also involve any sample carrying a certain amount of the proscribed drug, regardless of the material of the sample involved. Otherwise, fines and sentencing of drug offenses are left to the discretion of the individual states and as regards sentencing, there are, oftentimes, large disparities between each. On the whole, however, the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Law attempts to achieve national consistency by drafting drug-related legislation that is effective throughout the nation.

Drug-control policy in the United States formats itself on a five-tiered platform that is composed of prevention, education treatment, research, and supply reduction activities. Various government departments manage the War on Drugs and activities are instituted to dissuade foreign countries from producing or transmitting drugs to the U.S.A. Nonetheless, problems exist, people persist in smuggling and using drugs, and the so-called War continues.

Impact of Policy & Analysis

Some of the troubling issues of this War on Drugs include the cost of incarceration, involved police corruption, and the unequal impact of federal penalties on racial minorities. There is a mixed debate on the efficacy of this War: whilst some have suggested decriminalization of certain drugs, others have called for modification of certain policies, or maintaining them whilst conducting more research. More significantly, the LaGuardia Committee Report (1944), the Shafer Commission (1972), the National Research Council (1982), and the National Academy of Sciences (1999) demonstrated that the hype surrounding marijuana was largely unfounded. The ABA-AMA Joint Committee on Narcotic Drugs (1961) and the New York County Lawyers Association (1996) concluded that drugs should be best seen as a medical rather than a criminal offence.
The New York City Bar Association (1977), too, reported that federal penalties had done little to decrease drug trafficking (Dolin, 2001).

It may be time to consider the Harm Principle.

Judgment: What is the Harm Principle? Why is it effective?

The Harm Principle was first articulated by Mill (1859) in his "On Liberty" (and then duplicated in Locke's Second Treatise of Government, and in the works of von Humboldt) where Mill (1859) maintains that the government should desist from interfering in perpetration of victimless crimes. As Mill (1859) insists, the only reason for which a government can decide to interfere in the daily activities of its citizens is for protection of these citizens. Other activities that involve body or mind should be left up to the volition of the individual involved. As long as the individual is aware of the repercussions of these deeds, it is her or she who is, and should be, in charge of his behavior. Libertarianism holds this philosophy: "Libertarians believe that individuals should have complete freedom of action, provided their actions do not infringe on the freedom of others"(Boaz, Encyclopedia Britannica, 2010). Considering that government involvement in drugs has not only failed to inhibit the cycle, but there are troubling concerns as to whether or not the American government should involve itself in the first place in dissuading people not to abuse drugs, implementation of the Harms principle may be a more effective and cogent approach.

The Netherlands: their Stance to Drugs and the Harm's Principle

The Netherlands is a country that puts the Harms Principle in motion and it is a country that has consequently demonstrated a remarkable record in its ability to limit the damage that often results from misuse of drugs.

Most countries prohibit and penalize drug use on the basis of its destructiveness to the larger society. The emphasis is placed on drugs being damaging to the warp and woof of the country as a whole whilst the individual as person is ignored. The Netherlands, on the other hand, formulates its prohibition of drug use around the tenet of reducing harm to users. In this way, it demonstrates that its concern about drugs stems not so much from concern to structure of country but rather form concern of the drug's harm to the individual user. The government is telling the citizen: you can do better; drugs can harm you.

Putting the individual in control of his own health, the government arranges intervention to a minimum. It categorizes its drugs into 'soft' and 'hard' substances and controls both, with the application of a tolerance policy (gedoogbeleid) in regards to "soft drugs." Other countries specify the conditions under which substance abuse of "soft drugs" should be punished and the government should intervene, as see, for instance, the many laws passed by the U.S.A. The Dutch government, on the other hand, specifies the conditions under which offenses should be left alone and the government should refrain from intervening (Bewley-Taylor, David, & Fazey, 2003; Duncan, & Nicholson, 1997). According to current gedoogbeleid, for instance, possession of a maximum amount of five grams of cannabis for personal use is not prosecuted, but, if more is grown, this cannabis has to be handed over upon discovery. People like a certain amount of control over their lives. The Dutch government gives them this whilst making them aware of the danger of drugs and intervening only when absolutely necessary. It allows them a certain amount of freedom and this permission to 'sin' deflates the urge to rebel and the excitement and adventure that comes from so doing. It may be that a great percentage of substance abuse initiates (particularly with adolescents) with the exhilaration that comes from bucking the system and getting away with it. The Dutch government grants their citizens this permission thereby deflating any possible sense of violation from adventure. The American government, on the other hand, conceivably stimulates this sense for adventure in its harsh crack-down on possession of any type or quantity of drugs whatsoever. Dutch penalty too of drug use is less severe than that practiced by the American government. The U.S. government has the policy of life imprisonment for third felony offence of Substance 1 drugs, whilst Dutch penalty can feature 12 to 16 years of imprisonment for importing or exporting any hard drug (Duncan, & Nicholson, 1997).

The Netherlands and Result of their Battle with Drugs

The.....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


Related Essays

Social Policies in Community Agencies

perspective try to tackle systemic problems that lead to negative social issues. Social policy attempts to study how society promotes individual and family welfare. Also, the policies tend to be consistent with what the government of the day views to be the most optimal way to help those who are disadvantaged and can't help themselves. A number of these social policies are incorporated in the works of community agencies. They include availing supportive services to the vulnerable members of society and coming up with long-term policies handling care services so as to help this disadvantaged demographic. Serving Seniors Agency Social Problems, Social… Continue Reading...

Policies on Child Abuse and Neglect

Social Policy: Child Abuse and Neglect One of the essential components of the social work profession is safeguarding children from neglect and abuse. Professionals in this field work towards ensuring that children are protected from abuse and neglect in order to promote their development and growth into healthy, well-being adults. To achieve these goals, social work professionals carry out several initiatives including creating, implementing, and evaluating policy initiatives. The various initiatives adopted by social work professionals are targeted towards lessening child abuse and neglect as well as providing necessary resources… Continue Reading...

Social Work and Advocacy

.....fellow colleagues provided a varied and thoughtful perspective on social work professionals and social policy. One thing noted was the lack of available resources for social workers regarding their clients. Often clients may come from a foreign background and require translation. This can be difficult because most people in the United States speak only English with some speaking Spanish and Chinese. Having tools available to make translation easier can lead to more effective communication and ability to help the clients in what they need regardless of potential obstacles like language. When looking at the entirety of the social work profession, it was built… Continue Reading...

Political Ideologies: Social Liberalism

who lived in the 1700s and the early 1800s created a political framework which guided social policy in England, later the United States, then Europe and finally other inhabited areas of the world. In all these regions, no one fully followed this framework (Adams, 2001; von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, 1997). One of the early influential liberals who lived in the United States was John Locke, the English philosopher. Analysing his political documents, which had a huge influence on those who produced the American Constitution, they spoke in support of popular leadership, the freedom to fight back against oppression and the freedom of small religious groups to exist… Continue Reading...

Joe's Case Study and Evidence Based Practice

health care, social workers need to consider their role as catalysts for social policy reform. Joe's case demonstrates the importance of three core elements of social work: competency, evidence-based practice, and client confidentiality. All three of these issues are covered by the NASW (2013) in its specific approach to mental health and substance use disorders. Competency refers to a working command of recent health care policy as well as best practices. Therefore, competency is linked with the concept of evidence-based practice. Evidence-based practice ensures that social workers rely on research to guide best practices, and that professional expertise is directly supported by… Continue Reading...

H&M Trade Comparative Advantages

was, but rather a political and social policy. In that sense, once OPT has outlived its social and political useless, the fact that it was always rather useless economically becomes more of a blatant liability. For its part, H&M should not care all that much. It will buy from the producer with the competitive advantage – the lowest cost producer that can meet quality specs. The OPT only matters to the extent that its existence causes tariffs on textiles from low-cost producing nations to be held artificially high as a means of propping up the OPT.… Continue Reading...

Sample Wordpress Essay

this essay I will seek to critically examine a number of sociological explanations for the 'divorce phenomenon' and also consider the social policy implications that each explanation carries with it. It will be argued that the best explanations are to be found within a broad socio-economic framework. One type of explanation for rising divorce has focused on changes in laws relating to marriage. For example, Bilton, Bonnett and Jones (1987) argue that increased rates of divorce do not necessarily indicate that families are now more unstable. It is possible, they claim, that there has always been a degree of marital instability. They suggest that changes in the law have been significant,… Continue Reading...

sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Social Policy" (2013, March 20) Retrieved May 8, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/social-policy-102618

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Social Policy" 20 March 2013. Web.8 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/social-policy-102618>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Social Policy", 20 March 2013, Accessed.8 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/social-policy-102618