Systematic Review Essay

Total Length: 2235 words ( 7 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 5

Page 1 of 7

With the rapid increase in the research conducted on health sciences, there is difficulty for researchers and clinicians to be up-to-date with the studies. Therefore, reviews that give a summary of the impact of different intervention experiments are a greatly efficient way to come up with a conclusion of what is effective and what isn't. Systematic reviews are different from the traditional kind in many ways. According to Petticrew and Roberts (2006), the systematic type of reviews normally involve a comprehensive and in depth plan along with search approach that is presumptive, with the aim of reducing partiality by finding, assessing, and integrating all significant research on a certain subject. In most cases, systematic reviews involve a component of meta-analysis that uses statistical methods to integrate the information acquired from different research into one quantitative result or outline effect size (cited in Uman, 2011).



The systematic types of reviews are usually published in educational settings. However, there are some databases and organizations particularly meant for promoting and distributing them. For instance, Cochrane Collaboration is a highly known and regarded international non-profit-making firm that supports, promotes and distributes meta-analyses and systematic reviews on how effective health care interventions are (Uman, 2011).



Meaning and Purpose of Systematic Reviews



Systematic reviewing is giving an outline of the provided evidence on a well formulated query that uses explicit and systematic ways to find, choose and thoroughly assess significant primary studies as well as extract and evaluate information acquired from the research incorporated in that particular review" (p. 5). This kind of reviewing involves prior identification of its scope (e.g. reviewing queries and sub- queries and/or undertaking sub-group evaluations); a complete search for all relevant research; use of precise criteria to exclude or include research; incorporation of recognized standards to thoroughly assess research quality; and clear ways of extracting and incorporating research results is used. In addition, systematic review finds, assesses and incorporates all the studies available and significant to a certain review query; collates all the information on a certain subject and finds the foundation of that information. It is also a complete report that uses clear procedures so that methods, assumptions and rationale can be examined (Cochrane.org, 2005).



Issue of Concern in the Article



The population of hypertensive people above the age of 24 worldwide was around 40% in the year 2008. In 2009, the overall financial burden caused by hypertension in USA was around $73.4 billion. Better management of hypertension brings about better health results. A big systematic review including 147 experimental reports on hypertension management state that a decrease of 10 mm Hg systolic BP and 5 mm Hg diastolic has been linked with a decrease by 20% of heart problems (coronary) and by 32% in stroke within one year. In addition, hypertension management is inexpensive; medical treatment leads to better health outcomes (better adjusted life-span; QALYs) (Al-Ansary et al., 2013).



Purpose of the Paper



This review was aimed at evaluating the consistency and quality of propositions of modern global and national clinical guidelines on practice of examination, evaluation and control of hypertension, as well as to find out the level at which the guidelines are detailed by those systematic reviews that are Cochrane and those that are non-Cochrane (Al-Ansary et al., 2013).




Credibility of Authors



The review's protocol was developed as a component of a preliminary course on meta-analysis and systematic reviews taught by Sharon E. Straus (SES) and Andrea C. Tricco (ACT) through Li Kashing Institute of Knowledge in St. Michael's Medical Centre. Some of the results were presented through posters at Madrid in Spain, during Cochrane Colloquium 19 (October 2011).



Four writers; Andrea C. Tricco, Lubna A. Al-Ansary, Ghada A. Bawazeer and Yaser A. Adi were able to get all the initial guidelines; they were accountable for the information's integrity as well as the data evaluation's accuracy (Al-Ansary et al., 2013).



Overview of the Systematic Review



The review was meant to assess the consistency and quality of propositions of modern global and national guidelines on the examination, evaluation and control hypertension as well as to measure the level of comprehensiveness of the guidelines of those reviews that are Cochrane as well as those that are non-Cochrane. This review was done on the basis of a protocol and included input from professionals in high blood pressure and methods of systematic review (Al-Ansary et al., 2013).



With regard to exclusion and inclusion methods, multi-disciplinary guidelines embraced by a national provider or governmental organization linked with the examination, evaluation and control of high blood pressure were incorporated. Each population subgroup needed to be assessed to make sure the guidelines meet the requirements of people with different co-morbidities; CPGs were exclusively centred on high blood pressure among such special groups as the aged, blacks, pregnant women and people with diabetes and children or such special situations as exclusively primary care or exclusively emergency management were left out. To make sure that most modern guidelines were incorporated, there was limited inclusion for 2006 January onwards. In addition, only those guidelines that were in English were incorporated (Al-Ansary et al., 2013).



Medical text words and subject titles that were linked with guidelines and hypertension were used in searching EMBASE and MEDLINE through OVID line from 2006 January to 2011 September. Other than the search done through electronic database, there were search websites as well as Google, since the guidelines were not all indicated in databases. Particularly, the websites that were searched were: G-I-N;www.g-i-n.net, (www.guideline.gov), (www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines/index.htm), (www.nice.org.uk) and (SIGN;www.sign.ac.uk). The searches for literature were conducted by an experienced expert in information (LP) (Al-Ansary et al., 2013).



To ensure dependability, there was training before the process of study selection began, by randomly sampling 25 citations. There were two reviewers who autonomously screened the results of the search for inclusion by means of a relevance method form that was pre-defined. The full-text paper was acquired for possibly significant CPGs and they were….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


References


Al-Ansary, L. A., Tricco, A. C., Adi, Y., Bawazeer, G., Perrier, L., Al-Ghonaim, M., Alyousefi, N., Tashkandi, M. & Straus, S. E. (2013). A Systematic Review of Recent Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Diagnosis, Assessment and Management of Hypertension. PLoS One, 8(1), e53744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053744. Retrieved 6 September 2016 fromhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3547930/#pone.0053744.s002

Cochrane.org. (2005). Unit One: Background to Systematic Reviews. Retrieved 6 September 2016 fromhttps://ph.cochrane.org/sites/ph.cochrane.org/files/uploads/Unit_One.pdf

Harris, J. D., Quatman, C. E., Manring, M. M., Siston, R. A. &Flanigan, D. C. (2014). How to Write a Systematic Review. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 42(11), 2761-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546513497567.Retrieved 6 September 2016 from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23925575

Paperity team. (2016). A Systematic Review of Recent Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Diagnosis, Assessment and Management of Hypertension. Retrieved 6 September 2016 fromhttp://***.org/p/60981940/a-systematic-review-of-recent-clinical-practice-guidelines-on-the-diagnosis-assessment

Uman, L. S. (2011). Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 20(1), 57-59. Retrieved 6 September 2016 from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3024725/
Related Essays

Elderly Showing Early Signs of Dementia

Enhancement. Neuropsychology Review, 23(1), 13. doi:10.1007/s11065-013-9226-5 Lampit, A., Hallock, H., & Valenzuela, M. (2014). Computerized Cognitive Training in Cognitively Healthy Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Effect Modifiers. Plos Medicine, 11(11), 1-18. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001756 Nouchi, R., Taki, Y., Takeuchi, H., Hashizume, H., Nozawa, T., Kambara, T.,. .. & Kawashima, R. (2013). Brain training game boosts executive functions, working memory and processing speed in the young adults: a randomized controlled trial. PloS one, 8(2), e55518. Toril, P., Reales, J. M., & Ballesteros, S. (2014). Video game training enhances cognition of older adults: A meta-analytic study. Psychology and Aging, 29(3), 706-716. Annotated Bibliography Aristotle University Of, T., Greek Association for Alzheimer Disease and Related,… Continue Reading...

Joe's Case Study and Evidence Based Practice

stereotypes and stigmas toward patients with substance abuse disorders in particular. A systematic review of the literature reveals "negative attitudes of health professionals towards patients with substance use disorders are common and contribute to suboptimal health care for these patients," (Boekel, Brouwers, van Weeghel & Garresten, 2013, p. 23). Social workers are at the forefront of substance abuse treatment, as social work professionals "regularly encounter individuals, families, and communities affected by substance use disorders," including co-occurring disorders as in Joe's case (NASW, 2013, p. 5). Therefore, in addition to their role in reducing stigma and ensuring evidence-based practice in mental health care,… Continue Reading...

Research Paper Topic and Annotated Bibliography

of this study will entail consulting every resource accessible. The formal steps to conduct a systematic review of literature (Cronin, Ryan, & Coughlan, 2008) on one's research topic are as follows: • Choosing a topic for review • Conducting a literature search • Collecting, reading and analyzing literature • Writing down the review • Referencing Therefore, subsequent to choosing one's topic, the next step would be to peruse internet databases, books, journal articles, government publications, etc. In the current digital age, a successful, quality literature search is usually conducted with the aid of electronic and computer databases which provide access to huge amounts of swiftly-… Continue Reading...

Corporate Social Responsibility and Philanthropic Foundations

the subject. The method of gathering data employed in this study was a systematic review of a selected sample from the Fortune 500 list of organizations between the years 1996 and 2006. The purpose of using this sample was because large organizations are more engaged in corporate philanthropic activities than are small companies. A longitudinal study was conducted over a period of ten years in which dollars given to corporate charity organizations were log-transformed (this was the dependent variable), while the independent variables include assets belonging to the philanthropic organization, CEO tenure, the role/position of board members (centrality within the network), and gender… Continue Reading...

The Elderly and Dementia

methodology they used, meaning it could be duplicated by other researchers in the future to verify the study. However, the limitations of the systematic review do indicate that the information presented may not be wholly reliable because of the matter of too insignificant of sizes of samples used in the literature reviewed. Conclusion In conclusion, dementia is a problem that can impact 1-3 out of every 10 elderly persons in the U.S. Around the world it impacts millions every year and the numbers are only getting worse. Patients suffering from dementia and their loved ones need ways of coping with the disease as there is presently no cure for it and only a… Continue Reading...

Bariatric Surgery PICO Question

this question to nursing, particularly for practitioners who are dealing with an increasingly large population of patients suffering from obesity-related conditions. Systematic Review One: The Benefits of Surgical Intervention According to a systematic review of 7 randomized control trials (RCTs) involving bariatric patients conducted by Colquitt (et al. 2014), all studies found benefits for surgery in terms of weight loss combined with non-surgical control groups. Improvements included health-related quality of life outcomes and control of diabetes. No deaths occurred during any of the studies and serious adverse events ranged from 0-37% in the group which experienced the surgical intervention versus 0-25% in the groups which eschewed surgical intervention. This was deemed… Continue Reading...

Rounding by Nurses in the Progressive Care Unit

systematic reviews, qualitative analysis, quasi-experimental studies, and experimental studies (randomized control trials). McCaffrey and McConnell (2015) provide a systematic review of literature in their Level III study regarding how interdisciplinary team work can help nurses and care providers to better communicate and provide compassionate care (aka a high level of quality care) to patients. The interdisciplinary approach fosters a sense of shared governance among care providers, as Kutney-Lee, Germack, Hatfield et al. (2016) indicate in their Level III cross-sectional observational study that in hospitals where there is a substantial sense… Continue Reading...

Healthcare System and Practice Guideline

to this guideline This clinical practice guideline is centered on a systematic review of both clinical and epidemiological evidence. Having been created and advanced by a panel of multidisciplinary specialists, it offers a very clear elucidation of the sensible relationships between different care options while rating both the quality of the evidence in addition to the strength of the recommendations. With regard to professionals in the health care system, variations in practices will without a doubt and suitably take place when clinicians take into consideration the necessities of individual patients, accessible resources, and restrictions distinct to an institution or kind of… Continue Reading...

Metoprolol and Cardiac Surgery

is one such beta-blocker that is commonly administered to prevent the incidence of PoAF. The systematic review below entails an analysis of six clinical trials that explore the effectiveness of metoprolol. The analysis identifies reduced hospitalization length, reduced mortality and reduced financial burden as the beneficial impact associated with the administration of prophylactic. The small number of studies reviewed limits the validity of the conclusion warranting future large sample size research. Introduction Annually, approximately 750,000 cardiac surgery are performed globally with postoperative atrial fibrillation (PoAF) being the prevalent complications (George, et al., 2018). With the increasing proportion of elderly population globally, it’s expected that the number… Continue Reading...

Heart Disease and Stress

insight into the physiological links between mental states and cardiovascular health. In a systematic review of literature published in the American Journal of Hypertension, Cohen, Edmondson & Kornish (2015) showcase recent research on the connection between mental health in general and cardiovascular disease. Both epidemiological studies and smaller-scale empirical research have “firmly established a connection” between cardiovascular health and specific mental health states linked to stress including depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder. The authors summarize the findings from epidemiological and clinical studies detailing the specific physiological factors and biological mechanisms underlying the stress responses, detailing them for each of the relevant mental… Continue Reading...

Intellectual Disabilities

Cousins (2015) titled “People with intellectual disability and human science research: A systematic review of phenomenological studies using interviews for data collection”. The researchers, Deirdre, Taggart and Cousins (2015), examined the manner in which people suffering from intellectual disabilities could consent to their participation in a research. The researchers also discuss the methods of information dissemination and the methodology used in that dissemination hence increasing research value. Further, the researchers examine the manner in which Heideggerian phenomenology can be applied on people suffering intellectual disabilities. This research by Corb, Taggart and Cousins (2015) utilizes a systematic investigation review that utilized phenomenological methods… Continue Reading...

Patient Care and the Affordable Care Act

with Other Search Engines According to Houde (2009), the choice of a search engine in systematic reviews will significantly have an impact on Evidence Based Practice (EBP). The search engine will influence the number of retrieved records, the application relevance of the records, resultant adequacy of care given to the patient, and the subsequent time and money resources used in reviewing the results. In practice I undertook to search broad based terms and thesaurus terms in reviewing the experiences of patients living with leg ulcer. The result indicated that CINAHL database was effective in identifying all broad based terms while the conventional search engines (Bing… Continue Reading...

Virtual Teams: The New Way to Work

evaluating its applicability and validity. The abstract ought to follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) (Oermann, 2014). Did the author mention the problem addressed within the study? No. There is no explicit mention of the study problem. Rather, the authors have simply hinted at the issue by dealing with the broader, generic problems associated with virtual working. They have addressed the evolution of multiple working techniques into the technique adopted today. In the authors' words "As we move into the 21st century, the broad array of communication options permits the refiguring of our organizations in order to meet the rapidly… Continue Reading...

Public Sector Performance Measurement

of literature relating to performance management. The review is based on various types of sources, including conceptual articles, systematic reviews, as well as primary studies (case studies, surveys, and mixed methods studies). Following a comprehensive definition of PBM, attention is paid to the impact of PBM and employee and organizational outcomes, as well as PBM implementation, antecedents, and key success factors. What is PBM Defining PBM can be quite problematic, with the term being often confused with performance measurement (Rivenbank, Fasiello & Adamo, 2016). In addition, performance management is often thought to involve only personnel management processes such as employee performance appraisal (Turk, 2016). Furthermore, contention exists over… Continue Reading...

Self Management in Nursing

U.S. National Library of Medicine’s MEDLINE, · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials · American Psychological Association’s PsycARTICLES · Sociology Research Database SocINDEX · Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CIHAHL) Keywords used to conduct the searches were “behavior self-management.” History of Concept How it was identified. Creer was the first to use the term (Grady & Gough, 2014), which he applied to “indicate that the patient was an active participant in their care” (Lubkin & Larsen, 2013, p. 552). For Creer, self-management referred to the practice of giving the patient more… Continue Reading...

Problems with Random Assignment Experiments on Principals

outcomes. Based on interviews with district officials, a systematic review of the DPD materials, observations of the actual DPD training sessions, attendance records, and the principals’ personal logs and journals, the researchers collected substantive qualitative evidence that can be used to supplement their quantitative experimental research on the DPD. In other words, this study is a classic mixed-methods research design that uses both qualitative and quantitative methods judiciously. The qualitative methods are needed to illustrate why the program did not work, which is not something the data from the quantitative study could ever reveal. As it turned out… Continue Reading...

Identifying Opportunities to Improve Managerial Skills

skills that are regarded as critical for practitioners today. For example, based on his systematic review of the relevant literature, Schachter (2010) emphasizes that, "Not only do [managers] need to know [their] organization and the industry within which it operates, [they] have to be skilled at planning, organizing, supervising and leading staff through difficult times" (p. 33). These so-called hard skills assume even greater relevance and importance during periods of adversity or downturns in the economy when these conditions can result in ineffective managerial practices and the loss of market share (Schachter, 2010). Although every manager's working environment is unique, researchers have identified three… Continue Reading...

Pros and Cons of a Communication Strategy Nursing

strategies are that they are consistent and standardized but they do not empower nurses and nor do they empower patients. In a systematic review of barriers to communication during patient handoffs, Halm (2013) found that there were both sender-related and receiver-related problems in communication. Likewise, organizational culture issues were somewhat to blame for communications faults. Sender-related issues include offering too much or too little patient information during the handoff procedure. With higher quality and accuracy of information, the transitional periods would be more effective and patient-centric. Nurses on our team often demonstrate attentiveness problems because they are not encouraged to offer critical patient information that is not part of typical protocol. This… Continue Reading...

sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Systematic Review" (2016, September 10) Retrieved May 2, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/systematic-review-essay

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Systematic Review" 10 September 2016. Web.2 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/systematic-review-essay>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Systematic Review", 10 September 2016, Accessed.2 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/systematic-review-essay