Validity the Problem Discussed in the Case Essay

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 738 words ( 2 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 2

Page 1 of 2

Validity

The problem discussed in the case is whether or not the government should manage health care in the United States. The authors identify several problems with the current health care system, including costs that are rising faster than inflation, that health care coverage costs are rising even faster than that, and there are millions of uninsured. The problem can be tackled by using any of a number of logical approaches. Arguably, none of them were used by the articles, whose arguments would not cut muster at a decent high school, let alone in a journal.

Causal thinking seeks to understand the causes of the problem, as a means of identifying the areas where remedy should be applied. There are several causes of the problems. Costs are escalating in part because of innovation, which drives higher quality but also makes costs increase. Insurance companies also contribute to the cost, because of profit-taking. All told, health care providers and insurance companies are in a position where they take profits that are very high because buyers and payers do not have adequate knowledge of the cost structure of health care services -- they are price takers.

Stuck Writing Your "Validity the Problem Discussed in the Case" Essay?

View All Our Example Validity the Problem Discussed in the Case Essay

Have A Custom Example Essay Written



Had the authors applied causal thinking, they would not say such absurd things like "free health care causes the spread of disease" -- they would have looked for evidence to back up their claim and found none. The causal analysis breaks down again when they claim that people who presently cannot afford health care would see no changes if health care was free -- how does that work? When you lower the price, more people can afford it. Call it cause and effect, or call it supply and demand, but the authors do not seem to understand basic cause-and-effect models here. None of their claims flows from an understanding of the causal links in health care.

Another model of thinking is logical, which can be inductive, deductive or abductive. To understand the underlying reasons behind a problem, abductive reasoning is the most appropriate, because it relies on inference to the best explanation. This method of thinking still relies on understanding the causal pathways. The first thing is that there are many problems in the health….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Validity The Problem Discussed In The Case" (2014, April 29) Retrieved May 21, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/validity-problem-discussed-case-188673

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Validity The Problem Discussed In The Case" 29 April 2014. Web.21 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/validity-problem-discussed-case-188673>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Validity The Problem Discussed In The Case", 29 April 2014, Accessed.21 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/validity-problem-discussed-case-188673
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example