In this essay about net neutrality, we provide an overview of what net neutrality is and why it is a current political issue. The essay will define net neutrality. Furthermore, it will describe the pros and cons of net neutrality, including reasons that net neutrality is beneficial and ways that it could be detrimental.
The essay will discuss the current legal status of net neutrality, as well as the potential future of net neutrality. In doing so, the essay will discuss some figures, including head of the Federal Communications Commission, Ajit Pai. In addition to giving you an overview of net neutrality, the essay will also provide you with an excellent guide for how to write academic essays. It includes all parts of an academic essay: introduction, hook, thesis statement, a body that includes evidence and analysis, a conclusion, and a works cited section. All sources are properly quoted and cited in the essay. Therefore, you will be able to use it as a template in your own academic writing endeavors.
Ajit Pai- Ajit Pai is the controversial chairman of the FCC, who has made it his personal mission to end the concept of net neutrality. While Pai has made efforts to appear hip, he has alienated most of the internet community, including many service providers. Although he may be reviled by some, Pai retains an inordinate amount of power over internet service in the United States. This essay would focus, not only on Pai’s official role, but on some of his personal behaviors that indicate that ending net neutrality is a personal issue for him.
The Role of the FCC in Regulating the Internet- The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is responsible for overseeing several types of communication in the United States, including internet communications. This essay would focus on how it carries out that role and whether it has the power to determine issues like net neutrality on its own.
Is Net Neutrality Coming to an End?
Is Net Neutrality a Good Thing?
Would Ending Net Neutrality Really Change the Internet?
Can the FCC end Net Neutrality?
a. What is net neutrality?
b. Pros and cons of net neutrality
c. Why is it bad?
d. Why is it good?
e. Current status of net neutrality
f. Future of net neutrality
Net neutrality refers to the idea that Internet service providers (ISPs) should provide equal access to all content and applications on the internet. True net neutrality requires that ISPs treat all types of data the same, without regard to content, website, platform, application, method of communication, user, or equipment used. Net neutrality not only means that ISPs will not block access to certain websites, but also that they will not provide surcharges for access to certain websites or make data transmission speed dependent upon the type of data being accessed. Net neutrality became an issue for the FCC when the internet became a major form of communication. In 2005, the FCC adopted net neutrality principles, but attempts to pass a bill in Congress requiring net neutrality failed from 2005 to 2012. While Congress refused to act, in December 2010, the FCC passed six net neutrality principles and the FCC Open Internet Order, which prohibited cable and telephone providers from preventing access to competitors or websites like Netflix, as well as requiring: transparency, no blocking, a level playing field, network management, mobile rules, and vigilance. Although modified by some judicial decisions, these rules remained in effect for most of the Obama Administration. However, the Trump Administration made it clear that it opposed net neutrality when President Trump appointed Ajit Pai as the chairman of the FCC. Pai opposes net neutrality and began rolling back net neutrality rules in May of 2017.
The majority of Americans support net neutrality (Neidig, 2017), which has not only made Trump Administration efforts to roll back net neutrality protections unpopular, but has also led to Pai being considered a villain by many.
Although net neutrality may seem like a fairly straightforward issue regarding access to communications, it is actually symbolic of a much more pervasive political issue: who should have more power in American society, the companies that create goods and services or the users who use them?
What is Net Neutrality?
Coined by Columbia University Media Law professor Tim Wu in 2003, the term net neutrality refers to the idea that Internet service providers should be required to enable access to all content and applications available on the internet, regardless of their source, without favoring or blocking particular websites, applications, or products (Wikipedia, 2018). The idea is that the internet service provider (ISP) is paid to provide the user with access to the entire internet, not to act as a barrier to some information. The alternative to net neutrality would allow ISPs to provide preferred access to some users or providers. While different tiered models could exist, tiers could charge different users different amounts for service, charge for different levels of access, or even charge websites to allow users to access them. For example, some service providers slowed or throttled uploads from some sights, including peer-to-peer file sharing (P2P) sites, and sites from competitors like Vonage, Netflix, and YouTube. Under net neutrality rules, the FCC is able to penalize throttling and enforce the user’s ability to freely access the entire internet through an ISP. Net neutrality does not prohibit ISPs for charging more money for faster access speeds, just on discriminating based on content of the websites.
Pros and Cons of Net Neutrality
On the surface, net neutrality seems like a completely good concept. It makes sense that internet users who have paid to access the internet should be able to use their ISPs to access all of the internet, without the ISP acting like a nanny and restricting or slowing access to some websites. However, there are some arguments that net neutrality could have negative long-term and short-term impacts on communications in the United States. To really understand the net neutrality issue, one has to first looks at the pros and cons. Like many issues in modern American politics, it becomes clear that the debate over net neutrality is a debate between those who control the internet and those who use it.
What is Bad about Net Neutrality?
According to arguments made by many ISPs, net neutrality has many negatives. For example, ISPs complain that competitor services, such as Netflix, Google Phone, Skype, and YouTube, require enormous amounts of data, slowing access for all of their customers without requiring the paid-for services that these service providers would have used for upkeep and improvement of the hardware and software that they use to provide internet services for their customers. They argue that allowing them to charge higher fees, either to users who use more bandwidth or to websites that transmit more data and use more bandwidth, they would have the resources to build the types of advanced fiber networks that would increase internet access for consumers as a whole (Pogue, 2014). In addition, there is the fact that questionable content, whether it is access to illegal P2P websites or even to dark web sites, is much more difficult to regulate under net neutrality rules. If providers were allowed to block content from these sites, then they could be regulated more easily. Finally, one of the biggest cons of net neutrality focuses on profitability. Currently, ISPs provide free or reduced cost internet services for many people who are considered impoverished. The argument is that, if unable to manage profitability based on who is using the most bandwidth, ISPs will have to focus on other ways of maximizing profitability, including eliminating or reducing access for non-paying consumers.
What is Good about Net Neutrality?
The pros of net neutrality are far easier to outline than the cons. The internet was created to be neutral, and to provide a way for all users to access all content. The internet was developed with the idea that ISPs should be like phone service providers, providing the same connection regardless of what data you are accessing. Proponents of net neutrality suggest that it protects innovation, by keeping big companies from paying for special treatment and putting start-ups at a disadvantage. More importantly, proponents suggest that net neutrality protects free speech, by prohibiting ISPs from giving preferential treatment to some content, or, worse, blocking or throttling access to other content. Perhaps most importantly, true net neutrality would require reclassifying ISPs from their current classification to something more like a utility, which would mean that ISPs would be required to provide services to any customer willing to pay for them, regardless of credit, type of business, or the user’s assets.
In this dark Net essay, we will investigate the dark Net. We will describe what it is, what it is not, and how to access in it. The essay will contain information about how the dark web became a way to engage in criminal activity, including: buying and selling drugs; buying and selling weapons; buying and selling fake IDs; trafficking in counterfeit goods; and buying and selling credit card information, social security numbers, and other information necessary for identity theft. The essay will delve into some of the history of the dark Net,… Continue Reading...
Net such as, web browser, URL, Wi-Fi, Network, firewalls, email, phishing, malware, and more. InterNet The interNet, in simple terms, occasionally called as ‘Net,’ is a global computer Network system - a Network system wherein users on one PC could, if they have authorization, get data from any other PC (and sometimes directly talk to users of various other PCs). The concept of interNet got introduced in the year 1969 by the U.S. government’s ARPA--Advanced Research Projects Agency and was initially called as the ARPANet. The interNet physically uses a… Continue Reading...
“We are caught in an inescapable Network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly affects all indirectly.” This is one of the most insightful remarks about human existence, but also in regards to the lasting effects of segregation. Segregation, while benefiting whites in some ways, also dragged them down in others. Here King urges all members of society to not deny the connection that exists between them, as doing so is unproductive. “Just as Socrates felt that it was necessary to create a tension in the mind so that individuals… Continue Reading...
The ge Netic identity is being forged stronger every day after conception, and even if what is there might not look exactly like a person, it is a person. The American College of Pediatricians agrees: “The predominance of human biological research confirms that human life begins at conception—fertilization. At fertilization, the human being emerges as a whole, geNetically distinct, individuated zygotic living human organism, a member of the species Homo sapiens, needing only the proper environment in order to grow and develop. The difference between the individual in its adult stage and… Continue Reading...
Election Influencing and the Inter Net- The allegations that Russia influenced the 2016 presidential election are multi-faceted. In addition to claims of possible tampering with election machines and votes, the claims include Russia’s role in using social media to influence the outcome of the election. An essay on this topic would discuss how social media has been used to influence elections, both in the United States and abroad. Titles The Mueller Investigation Did the Trump Campaign Collude with Russia to Influence the 2016 Election? Is the Mueller Investigation a Partisan Witch-Hunt? Why the Mueller Investigation… Continue Reading...
Net has shaped so much of how business is conducted today. There is now a global market for firms and customers who now have access to a range of nations they had never been able to interact with before. Even some of the smallest villages can begin to start their own businesses selling crafts and goods online: handmade baskets, necklaces, scarves etc. can all be made and sold online to people all over the world: there truly are endless possibilities. This is a huge change that has occurred in the… Continue Reading...
Netic factors and environmental factors, starting during fetal development and continuing throughout life” (NRCIM, 2001). Hence, given the nature versus nurture debate, experts now know that while genes have an indelible impact on the biological development of the young person, the environmental input ensures that the biological development occurs at all: nature and nurture both shape behavior (NRCIM, 2001). Juvenile Delinquency Defined There are a host of definitions that abound for what qualifies as a juvenile and what standards equate to a juvenile delinquent. A “Juvenile is considered as a… Continue Reading...
Nett (2014) notes, being a college athlete is more than a full-time job. When most athletes are also full-time students, either sports or education will take a hit—and the reality is that in the college sports industry, student athletes are expected to give 100% to athletics, even if it means missing classes to do so. That’s why the average Division I college football athlete will give more than 43 hours a week to practicing and training for games. That’s three hours more than the average full-time worker puts in at… Continue Reading...
Net usage. Cambridge Analytical has played a significant role in the Facebook security breach because of its role in mining data from Facebook users, where it inappropriately collected data from over 50 million Facebook users. An essay focusing on Cambridge Analytical would examine the company’s history, board of directors, role in prior elections, and role in the Facebook scandal. Cybersecurity and Social Media- Cybersecurity refers to being protected against both criminal and unauthorized use of data that you share to use interNet sites. Although generally used in the context of… Continue Reading...
Netary exchange system. Cryptocurrencies are insulated from the fluctuations that take place in financial systems, and are especially attractive to buyers in countries that have volatile or weak currencies, like China. For this reason, governments are already trying to crack down on cryptocurrency exchanges (Hawkins, 2017). Relatively few people have bitcoin now, but if more people invest their money in bitcoin, the less the governments can regulate their own financial systems, including systems of taxation. Governments are likely to monitor bitcoin in the future, and disguise any attempt to shut… Continue Reading...
We have received your question successfully
Have Any Questions? Our Expert Writers Can Answer!